This post by James Delingpole, is copied here for a couple of reasons.

Image via Wikipedia

The representation of the AGW case by the presenter, Naomi Klein, is ridiculously unsupportable and valueless, as James suggests, yet it is being used to prop up the need for a solution of gigantic social consequences.

This proposed New World Order solution has long been one of the threads of my posts and dissertations on the AGW scam. In fact, this particular motivation for the AGW scam initiated my interest in the AGW debate.

At one time I too was ridiculing Andrew Bolt, saying “of course global warming is occurring and is a problem, I can feel the sun is hotter, I can see the ice shelves calving”. Now having read extensively a great deal of information, I believe that I understand the real situation and fully support the debate against the AGW ‘industry’.

My related contribution is featured in this site’s “Motivations” page, (‘Carbon Attack’), where the third section of text reads:

““Global Warming” is, and always was, a policy for genocidal reduction of the world’s population. The preposterous claim that human-produced carbon dioxide will broil the Earth, melt the ice caps, and destroy human life, came out of a 1975 conference in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, organized by the influential anthropologist Margaret Mead, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), in 1974.”

The full story then follows, see “https://tgrule.wordpress.com/carbon-attack/motivation/“.

This NWO motivation for creating the AGW agenda, has not been stressed too much in this blog because many believe it to be a ‘crackpot’ theory. But, as one of many reasons for doubting the IPCC claims, it is a meaningful piece of the overall picture puzzle that explains the sometimes inexplicable goings on by the ‘warmist’ fraternity.

The NWO theme is, however, now becoming more into the open, as shown by the Naomi Klein presentation. This is not a single person making a suggestion. She represents a movement and is promoting the NWO scheme on their behalf. It is good to have some substance to give credibility to my posts.

Here’s what James has to say:

No Logo author Naomi Klein has a solution to climate change and it goes like this: punitive taxation; massive wealth re-distribution; the abolition of free trade and free markets; a state-enforced end to to the “cult of shopping”; the whole to be supervised by a New World Order of selfless illuminati (who presumably resemble Naomi Klein).

If it weren’t so scary it would almost be funny, the way the leftie Canadian activist on the basis of no evidence whatsoever declares that the time has come to strip the human race of all its hard-won freedoms in order to save the planet from a non-existent problem. Unfortunately, Klein means it and her audience takes her seriously. Just read the first comment below her screed:

I can’t say enough good things about this article. It’s a manifesto for the next 100 years. Corporate capitalism is doomed by the immutable fact of finite resources; it will require planning and sharing to sustain civilization in the future, which is heretical thinking in the boardrooms of elite capitalists.

O-K. And the rationale for doing all this stuff would be what, exactly, Naomi? Some new devastating proof you’ve managed to unearth, perhaps, showing once and for all that the measurements are wrong and global warming didn’t stop in 1998? A dazzling refutation of Svensmark’s cosmic ray theory? Surprising new data showing that, contrary to the false consciousness promoted by the running dog lackey capitalist pigs who write our history books, totalitarian planning regimes of the kind you advocate in fact brought nothing but bounty, happiness and environmental loveliness to Stalin’s Soviet Union, Hitler’s Germany, Mao’s China, Pol Pot’s Cambodia and Kim Il Sung’s North Korea?

Nope. All Naomi can manage by way of justification is this:

Before I go any further, let me be absolutely clear: as 97 percent of the world’s climate scientists attest, the Heartlanders are completely wrong about the science. The heat-trapping gases released into the atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels are already causing temperatures to increase. If we are not on a radically different energy path by the end of this decade, we are in for a world of pain.

Er, Naomi. Here are some things you should know before you type out your next eco-fascistic horror rant. 1. That “97 per cent” figure: it’s kind of an urban myth. 2. The heat-trapping gas and fossil fuel theory: it’s at best moot, not least because the “feedbacks” – as you’d know if you’d bothered to do a scintilla of research – are still so ill-understood.  3. the “radically different energy path” bit: Says who? And on what evidence? 4. “a world of pain”. Right. And you’ll have done a cost benefit analysis here will you? You can show us that the freedom-destroying, economy-ruining totalitarianism you advocate will a) make the blindest bit of difference to global mean temperatures and b) cause less pain than a world where it’s ever so slightly warmer and where people are free to shop without jackbooted Canadian eco-activists stamping up and down shrieking: “Das ist Verboten!”?

I don’t think so.

You are right James, the NWO idea would do nothing, or next to nothing, for global temperature modification. They know that and are just using it as, what is turning out to be a pathetic excuse, to develop a world-wide financial and social restructuring to suit the bankers and the elite. And so many people are being taken for a ride on the strength of the pathetic excuse. However, more and more warmist scientists are beginning to soften their attitudes.

The NWO subject, is itself an issue requiring huge coverage. Although it is one of my pet injustice topics, more relevant reader-friendly issues are taking precedence. Much evidence exists to support my beliefs.

James source article is linked here.

Related articles

• Only A Totalitarian New World Order Can Save Us Now Says Naomi Klein (papundits.wordpress.com)
• No brain author seeks final solution (junkscience.com)
• Chris Horner Videos – Global Warming fraudulent.
• Donna Laframboise’s new exposé book on the IPCC
• A One World Government and Global Depopulation
• Malcolm Turnbull, CO2 emissions trading, Britain and MOTIVATIONS.