One does not need to be a scientist to understand the significance of these graphs. Whether you choose the linear trends or the 5 year averages, it is clear that the models FAIL.
What seems to be hard for the warmist “scientists” and supporters to understand is that this means that the climate change (“CO2 means warming”) “science” FAILS to be valid. No amount of rhetoric or verbal abuse can alter the evidence and reasonable conclusion this post contributes.
Related articles
- Climate modeling EPIC FAIL – Spencer: the day of reckoning has arrived (wattsupwiththat.com)
- Global Warming Alarmism In Twilight (powerlineblog.com)
- A Case Study in Denial and Fanaticism (powerlineblog.com)
The GOLDEN RULE 
Thanks Ken. The entire post-1945 scientific edifice must fall:
Comments would be appreciated on a paper in progress, “Neutron repulsion: Source of life.”
Click to access Neutron_Repulsion-Source_of_Life.pdf
I will be on vacation next week but able to receive comments sent to omatumr@yahoo.com
Comments on personal bias or distortions would be especially helpful. I hope to complete and submit the complete paper for publication when I return.
Thanks for your assistance.
With kind regards, – Oliver K. Manuel
Sent from my iPhone