The Obama Administration is a ‘State Sponsor of Terrorism’


“According to the 2001 Patriot Act, those “who pay for the bomb,” namely those who fund affiliates of Al Qaeda, are terrorists. In the words of George W. Bush on September 11, 2001, “We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.”

Another glaring example of the hypocrisy and double standards of the USA and its allies.

COTO Report

osamaobamaBy Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research

A major transition in US counter-terrorism doctrine is unfolding. While Barack Obama, following in the footsteps of  George W. Bush, remains firmly committed to waging a “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), his administration is now openly supporting selected rebel units in Syria which are part of the Al Qaeda network.

Known and documented, Al Qaeda is a creation of the CIA, which has covertly supported the “Islamic Terror Network” since the heyday of the Soviet Afghan war.  While Al Qaeda is a US sponsored “intelligence asset”, a “New Normal” has been established.

View original post 2,420 more words

Advertisements

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', MIDDLE EAST, War Crimes, World Issues and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Obama Administration is a ‘State Sponsor of Terrorism’

  1. omanuel says:

    It is indeed a strange, strange world. Physics is now fantasy:

    The entire universe is just two forms of one fundamental particle: The neutron (n) and an expanded form, the hydrogen atom (H).

    Forget all theoretical garbage published after 1945 to enslave society and protect leaders from possible nuclear annihilation. 

    The universe is simple and can be understood by all (except those filled with pride). 

    There is no need to assume or to believe models of:

    1. H-filled stars
    2. Big Bang 
    3. Black Holes
    4. N-N attraction
    5. Quarks & bosons
    6. Oscillating solar neutrinos, etc., etc.

    Oliver K. Manuel

    • Hi Oliver. Thanks for your comments. I am preparing a response to your earlier submissions, hopefully ready soon, and we can maybe make progress with my understanding your theories.
      There are also two pet items of mine, one you just mentioned – Black Holes, the other, – time relative to velocity.
      Whether any of this will make sense will be interesting to discover.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s