Vaccines – Legitimate Evidence of Adverse Reactions becoming Overwhelming!

Posted on September 16, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Inspired by ‘The Internet Post’:

Vaccinations,  ref: http://theinternetpost.net/2015/09/14/vaccinations/

Related Articles:

23 Seniors Died After Receiving Flu Shot Sold by Pharmacies

 

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, medical, Vaccinations, Vaccine Dangers, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

9/11 – Continuing the Fight for the Truth to be Made Public.

Posted on September 12, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

CLN Logo Horiz-500x100

One of my real-news sources offers these thoughts and information to try and correct the imbalance in the reporting on this horrific event.

 Hope it publishes ok! Ken McMurtrie.

Dear Ken,

Today, CLN pays tribute to those who perished in the tragic events of September 11, 2001, and in the wars that have followed. We do so by continuing to seek out and share new information about 9/11.

Normally, our most popular articles are very upbeat: inspirational stories and good news. Today it’s been different. Three of our top five most viewed posts are about 9/11. (I’m glad so many people are educating themselves about the event that changed everything):

▪ 9/11 Bombshell New Evidence: Methodical Deception — Rebekah Roth
▪ 9/11 MUST SEE: “I can prove that it was NOT an airplane” that Hit the Pentagon – Major General Albert N. Stubblebine
▪ 25 Hard Facts About 9/11 That Cannot Be Debunked

All three are excellent articles. I highly recommend the interview with Rebekah Roth, who just happens to be an ex flight attendant. It’s fascinating, eye-opening, and it’s fresh (it was just posted on YouTube yesterday). Rebekah presents powerful evidence I’ve never heard before – like what really happened with several of the planes. Please watch and share.

So, why should we care about 9/11 all these years later? Some say it’s history, let it go. Move on. Stop dwelling on the negative.

I can’t. As long as U.S. is instigating and fighting wars in the guise of protecting the world from terrorists, I can’t let it go. 9/11 is what started everything: the “Patriot Act”, the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, and eventually Libya and now Syria. Plus there’s the drone killings in Yemen and Pakistan. Millions upon millions have been killed, maimed, and displaced.

Even the gut-wrenching refugee situation in Syria is related to 9/11. See: Ron Paul Talks About The Real Refugee Problem and How We Can Solve It (Video).

Did you know that many of the invasions were planned within weeks after 9/11 (and likely much earlier). See:Within Weeks After 9/11, Gen Wesley Clark Was Shown US Plan To Invade Iraq, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran

When will it all stop? Nobody knows for sure. But, I personally think it it won’t stop until a critical mass of people wake up (approximately 70% still believe the official story) and actually care enough about our fellow human beings to demand a halt to the madness.

On a related note, AE911Truth’s new 50-page guide to the World Trade Center evidence was released earlier this week at BeyondMisinformation.org. I encourage you to download the booklet and forward it to everyone you know.

Please enjoy our latest Editor’s Picks:

▪ A Tribute to Some of the Unsung (Human and Canine) Heroes of 9/11 (Video)
▪ CLN RADIO NEW EPISODE: A Tribute to Wayne Dyer – A Friend & Colleague Speaks by Alexis )Brooks
▪ How To Communicate A Difficult Truth With Love!
▪ 5 Tips to Get You Living the Dream! by Cherie Roe Dirksen
▪ New Moon in Virgo Invites You to Heal with Loving Touch by Bekah Finch Turner
▪ 3 Reasons Why You Manifest the Same Problem Again and Again by Andrea Schulman
▪ Ayurveda’s Tough Love Recipe for a Good Night’s Sleep (Or How to Sleep Like a Baby) by Barbara Sinclair
▪ Love A Veteran? Learn How The Power Of Breath Is Healing Post-War Trauma
▪ Proof that Self-Healing Works & 5 Steps To Start Doing It Successfully
▪ Guys: Why It’s Wise To Worship a Woman & How To Do It

Love and blessings,

Ross & Vicki
& The CLN Team

P.S. If you enjoy CLN, then please share CLN with friends & family. Feel free to forward this email. Thanks for being a part of our CLN family!
Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', Atrocities, World Issues | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Understanding Vaccine Issues – the Dangers and the Illusions

Posted on September 8, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Direct from ‘Organic Lifestyle’ by Joel Edwards.

A Look at the Vaccine Schedule and Autism Rates

All too often those of us opposed to vaccines hear a simple, yet tired counterargument, “Well I had my shots as a kid and I’m fine.” The adults who make this claim don’t seem to realize the number of shots they received was far fewer than the number of shots on today’s vaccine schedule. And few of them follow the adult vaccine schedule.

In reality, the very well vaccinated are not a healthy bunch. They get sick regularly. This is particularly evident for those who get regular flu shots.

American children receive far more vaccines now than at any other time in U.S. history, and they receive more vaccines than children living in any other country. If vaccines were in fact so effective, one would think that America would have the healthiest children. This is not the case at all. Aside from starving children in 3rd world countries, American children are among the sickest children in the world.

Big Pharma purports to have all the answers, except of course, what is causing all of these childhood illnesses. Rising rates of autism and other chronic illnesses are said to be a complete mystery (if you wish to be demystified simply read a vaccine warning insert). Despite their supposed cluelessness about our sudden epidemics of chronic illness, both the pharmaceutical companies and the government claim to “know” that “vaccines are safe and effective”. SIDS, asthma, ADHD, ADD, and autism are all considered to be mysterious diseases with an unknown or a genetic cause. This may sound good, but genetic epidemics are not possible, and there are few environmental toxins that could have such a widespread impact on children of all 50 states, at the same time. The most likely environmental toxins that could have spread to all American children simultaneously are toxins from food and vaccines. We at OLM side with the growing number of scientists who think that vaccines, pesticides, and GMOs are the main causes of our childhood illnesses, with vaccines as the primary cause of our nation’s rapidly declining health.

Below is a look at earlier vaccine schedules compared to the current vaccine schedule “recommended” by the CDC. CDC vaccine recommendations are becoming mandatory across the U.S.

A Historical Look at the Vaccine Schedule

1983 Schedule  –  11 vaccines

1994 Schedule  –  18 vaccines

2015 Schedule  –  54 vaccines

Autism Rates in America

  • 1975: 1 in 5,000

  • 1985: 1 in 2,500

  • 1995: 1 in 500

  • 2000: 1 in 150

  • 2004: 1 in 125

  • 2006: 1 in 110

  • 2008: 1 in 88

  • 2010-2014: 1 in 68

Sources: cdc.gov, autismspeaks.org

As the number of scheduled vaccines has risen, so have the rates of now common childhood diseases including ADD/ADHD, SIDS, and asthma. Before the 1970s, ADD and ADHD were not even prevalent enough for a diagnosis to exist in the DSM. The first related diagnosis came out in the DSM-II as “Hyperkinetic Reaction of Childhood”. This was later changed to “ADD with or without hyperactivity” in the DSM-III in the 1980s. It was further clarified in later editions. The number of children (and adults) that have been prescribed ADD/ADHD drugs has skyrocketed over the past few decades. And asthma rates have also experienced a sharp rise over the years.

According to Harris Coulter, a medical historian and scientist, SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) was not reported in the statistics before the rise of mass vaccinations because of its rarity. As vaccination rates have risen, so have SIDS rates. When Japan put a moratorium on all vaccinations before the age of two, their SIDS rate plummeted to almost nothing. Although they are every bit as scientifically adept as we are and highly technologically advanced, their schedule has less than half the recommended vaccinations as the United States schedule.

Just as not everyone can eat the same foods, not everyone can tolerate the same medications. It is incredibly naive to think that just because your child survived vaccines without severe injury, that no harm was done. As more and more vaccines are added to the schedule, the painful reality is becoming clear. Health does not need to be treated as a disease. How many more must die or become disabled by this practice before we wake up and realize what is happening? If you’ve been vaccinated, be sure to check out How to Detox From Vaccines (adults and children).

The complete source article, including the vaccine lists and a recommended reading list, is linked here.

Remember that we are arguing the case against the need for unnecessarily excessive and mandatory vaccinations in America, Australia and others with  healthy environments, healthy food and clean water, and sanitary systems. Also against the ethics adopted by the medical industry and authorities in their unjustified authoritarian behaviour.

Posted in AUSTRALIA, drugs & medication, HEALTH, Vaccinations, Vaccine Dangers, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Has Australia slyly entered the Western program of demonizing Islam?

Posted on August 25, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

More to the point, are we actively participating in unauthorized and unjustified warfare? Are we brainwashing the citizens of Australia? Are we generating false events in order to support unjustified security restrictions on the public? Australia in Brief

Time for some thought-provocation and assessment regarding Australia’s following in the US footsteps with potentially horrific consequences.

This event appears to closely follow that of the US false-flag events, documented quite authentically, that are intended to brainwash citizens into accepting unacceptable intrusions into other  countries and peoples personal liberties.

It would be a great pity if the Australian public cannot begin to see the reality. Hopefully they will let Tony Abbott know that he is responsible to, and for, our citizens and country.  We do not wish to be part of the UN/US warmongering and destruction of our basic civilization. No matter how lacking it is in intelligent behaviour, it basically represents a desire to be humanitarian. The proposed alternative, demonstrated by this example, is based on a complete disregard for honesty, human life and humanitarian values.

Readers can be expected to make up their own minds, at least they now have evidence of a contrary nature, offering authenticity, to balance the usual bias and manipulation. That is, manipulation of events and citizens minds.

Very interested to hear readers opinions!

Is Sydney Siege inquest covering for ASIO?

The clear intention of the Coronial Inquest into the Sydney Siege is to exclude any testimony from Mamdouh Habib about his firsthand knowledge of gunman Man Haron Monis working for ASIO at the time of the siege.

This blatant suppression of evidence coincides with Habib’s statement that an ASIO officer on 21 August directly warned him against speaking to, or even attending, the inquest.

This treatment of Habib is a clear indication that powerful forces are determined to ensure the mandatory inquest is a cover-up, specifically of ASIO’s involvement with siege perpetrator Man Haron Monis in the lead-up to the siege.

For the record, if allowed, Mamdouh Habib would testify, under oath:

That around a month before the 15 December 2015 Lindt Café siege, Monis approached Mamdouh Habib to request his help. Monis, or Sheikh Haron as he was known to Habib, explained that ASIO had asked him to do a “job” for them, and that ASIO had directed him to ask Habib to help with the job. Monis did not explain what the job was, and Habib isn’t sure Monis even knew at the time. Monis explained that ASIO had promised they would help him win back custody of his two young sons, with whom the family court had cut him off from any contact the month before. Monis claimed that ASIO had also promised to reward Habib if he assisted, by helping him win his ongoing legal case in Egypt.
That Habib turned Monis down cold, because the request was from ASIO. Habib warned Monis, forcefully, to have nothing to do with ASIO, because, he said, ASIO can’t be trusted.
That a number of days after this approach from Monis, an ASIO officer called Habib directly, to convince him to agree to assist Monis, by confirming and reiterating ASIO’s offer to help his legal case in Egypt; again Habib refused.
That in the late afternoon on the day of the siege, when Habib confirmed that the gunman in the Lindt Café was “Sheikh Haron”, and that the police and media had known for hours it was Monis, he realised that the siege was a set-up, that it was most likely the “job” for ASIO that Monis and ASIO had sought to enlist him in. Habib’s first thought was, “Monis agreed to ASIO’s deal.”
That Habib, convinced it was a set-up, attempted to intervene to avert a disaster, by calling first the office of the Commonwealth Attorney-General in Canberra, and then the NSW Police, to insist he be allowed to help negotiate with Monis. Habib guaranteed them that he would convince Monis to surrender and release the hostages. On both calls Habib was turned down. The Attorney-General’s office transferred his call to ASIO, to whom Habib repeated his offer, but cautiously, because he knew ASIO was involved; ASIO also rejected the offer. On his final call, to the NSW Police, Habib warned that ASIO intended to kill Monis, and that if anyone died in the siege it would be the fault of the Australian government. Habib says that a FOI order would prove his calls to both the Attorney-General and NSW Police.
Habib’s evidence, of Monis working with ASIO just before the Sydney Siege, is explosive, and casts the siege in a completely different light. It is already patently clear that the siege had nothing to do with ISIS, as Prime Minister Abbott claims; instead, Habib’s evidence leads to other, more sinister, possibilities as to the cause of the siege, including: that it was an orchestrated terrorist attack, arranged by ASIO for political purposes; or, that it was an ASIO operation, gone wrong. The account of one hostage that Monis had said to her that “I have to kill one of us [you]”, and an early media report that he screamed at the storming police before he was killed, “Look what you’ve made me do”, points to the more likely possibility of the former.

The Sydney siege was part of a sequence of terrorist attacks that have occurred around the world in the last 1-2 years, in the context of the rise of ISIS, including the Canadian Parliament attack and the Charlie Hebdo massacre. In every case, the perpetrators of the attacks were “well known” to the relevant security agencies beforehand. This raises the question of how it is possible those agencies had no advance warning of the attacks. In the US, a July 2014 Human Rights Watch report entitled “Illusion of Justice: Human Rights Abuses in US Terrorism Prosecutions”, exposed how the FBI has actively orchestrated terrorist plots, claiming them to be “sting” operations, in which the FBI generated the idea, provided the equipment, and picked the target, but pinned the blame on some unsuspecting and often mentally-impaired dupe. The FBI has then publicised the arrest as another success in the War on Terror, which justifies its far-reaching police-state powers, and the US government’s continued operations in the Middle East, just as 9/11 was used to justify the illegal invasion of Iraq based on a lie. The UK’s security agencies MI5 and MI6 have their own extensive history of orchestrating terrorist attacks, as they did throughout the Irish “troubles” of the late 1960s into the 1990s, as well as through their intimate involvement with such notorious Islamic extremists as the self-admitted MI5 agent Abu Hamza. Their agents have been allowed to operate and proselytise freely in London while wanted for terrorist attacks overseas, and even to strike in Britain itself, all the better to justify police-state measures under the guise of “fighting terrorism”.

ASIO was set up at the behest of MI5 in 1949, and has functioned as merely the Australian branch of MI5 ever since. Mamdouh Habib forcefully warned Monis against working with ASIO, due to his own, firsthand experience with ASIO over many years, which included: years of harassment to pressure him to become an ASIO informer; ASIO’s involvement in his seizure in Pakistan in 2001; his rendition to Egypt to be tortured; his 2002-05 detention-without-charge in Guantanamo Bay; and ASIO’s active obstruction, under the cover of “national security”, of his legal proceedings to win redress for ASIO’s crimes against him.

The difficulties that the Sydney Siege inquest has experienced in getting a straight story out of the Director of Public Prosecutions, as to why Monis was out on bail at the time of the siege, already demonstrates active suppression of evidence. The Inquest will apparently allow ASIO to give testimony in closed session, which is seemingly routine for such an agency, but in the context of Habib’s evidence it provides enormous scope for ASIO to, as usual, use the fig leaf of national security to hide its true activities from the public.

If the NSW Coroner is to fulfil the responsibilities of his office to ascertain the truth of what caused the deaths in the Lindt Café, he must examine all of the evidence; therefore, he must take testimony from Mamdouh Habib, or else the public can only conclude his inquest is a cover-up.

From:

Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
Media Release Tuesday, 25 August 2015
Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
PO Box 376‚ COBURG‚ VIC 3058
Phone: 1800 636 432
Email: cec@cecaust.com.au
Website: http://www.cecaust.com.au

 

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', AUSTRALIA, Civil Liberties, Conspiracies | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Pharmaceutical Companies Have Corrupted Science and Government

Posted on August 17, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

A topical news item from ‘Focus For Health’:

Reference : https://www.focusforhealth.org/category/news/

This strongly associates with the American political and pharmaceutical scene but it has international applicability. What is to be learned is the degree of corruption throughout the associated organizations, including the government itself, which signifies the risks of giving uncritical credibility to pharmaceutical products, information and claims of safety and efficacy.

Have Pharmaceutical Companies Corrupted Science and Government?

In the article below, (my bold emphases), Dr. Lewis highlights how the billion dollar pharmaceutical industry’s influence extends into regulatory agencies, as well as to respected journals responsible for publishing scientific literature. Focus for Health supports positive efforts to ensure government transparency in the protection of public health.

The Oconee Enterprise, August 6, 2015:

Pharmaceutical Companies Have Corrupted Science and Government

Last week, big news media ignored Congressman Bill Posey imploring Congress to hold hearings after a leading government scientist admitted the CDC destroyed data linking MMR vaccine to autism in young black children.

Former CBS Evening News anchor Dan Rather recently commented that big media is controlled by big government working with big corporations for their mutual benefit. Pharmaceutical companies wield the most influence with Congress and the news media.

Unfortunately, the scientific literature has also been bought out. In 2011, Fiona Godlee, Editor-in-Chief of the British Medical Journal, testified before Parliament that the peer reviewed scientific literature has become the marketing arm of the pharmaceutical industry.

If Congress gets its way, things will only get worse. The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the 21st Century Cures Act, which would create a corporation to accelerate the development of new drugs and vaccines. It provides over $9 billion for the NIH and the FDA to fast-track them to market.

This federally-created corporation would, no doubt, be run by highly paid executives passing through the revolving door between government and industry. Instead of relying on case-controlled clinical trials, the new approval process for drugs and vaccines will incorporate anecdotal evidence from patients, parents, advocacy organizations, research sponsors and unnamed “others.” Blindly supporting the pharmaceutical industry appears to be one thing Republicans and Democrats alike have no problem agreeing upon.

Dr. Lewis’ article posted in The Oconee Enterprise:

2015_8_12 David Lewis Article

This summer, I was one of nine visitors invited to a meeting of the Royal Society of London to discuss growing public skepticism over key areas of science, including climate change and vaccine safety. Much of our discussion centered on the negative impact that pharmaceutical companies and certain federal agencies subject to corporate influence are having on scientific integrity. A recent survey of 1,756 parents in the United States, for example, found 82 percent believe vaccination can benefit public health; but only 32 percent trust information the CDC puts out.

To bolster compliance with CDC vaccine policies, the White House is funding faith-based organizations to promote vaccination. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius noted that religious groups play an important role in keeping communities healthy. It’s shameful that corporate influence has eroded public confidence to the point that religious organizations are being paid to vouch for CDC policies.

After buying out the news media, pharmaceutical companies are focused on controlling scientific journals and lobbying Congress to lower the standards for data used by the FDA and CDC to approve and recommend their products. Congress has shielded pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits over vaccine-related injuries; and its moving toward mandating all CDC-recommended vaccines. Drugs and vaccines are vital to public health. But once Congress and the scientific literature are controlled by pharmaceutical companies, how can the public trust these products? Congress must clean up the corruption.

The source article is linked here.

The author’s credentials:

David Lewis, Ph.D.

Former U.S. EPA Research Microbiologist

David Lewis is an internationally recognized research microbiologist whose work on public health and environmental issues, as a senior-level Research Microbiologist in EPA’s Office of Research & Development and member of the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia, has been reported in numerous news articles and documentaries from TIME magazine and Reader’s Digest to National Geographic.

 

 

Posted in Corruption, drugs & medication, HEALTH, Human Behaviour, medical, Science, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Economics and Banking – a Sensible Approach

Posted on August 17, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

A worthy outline and suggestion that would almost certainly benefit the world.

Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
Media Release Monday, 17 August 2015

“People’s Quantitative Easing”: 

The principles behind it

“The reality that sovereign national governments can create public credit and expend it for the Common Good, has now erupted as the central issue of MP Jeremy Corbyn’s bid to become the next leader of the Labour Party in the UK. Corbyn’s policy for the government creation of such credit—dubbed by some a “People’s Quantitative Easing”—has terrified and enraged the City of London bankers whose crimes will be stopped under “Corbynomics”. This, indeed, is the rub: will the City of London and Wall Street mafia continue to create credit for their own private usurious and speculative ends, for which the public ultimately pays through bloody austerity, or will national governments seize that power back from them?

That sovereign power of credit has actually been wielded from time to time by sovereign governments, precisely as Corbyn proposes, if all too rarely. Under its first Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, it was the bedrock upon which the bankrupt new nation of the United States was consolidated after the Revolutionary War of 1776–1783; it was reasserted through President Abraham Lincoln’s “greenback” policy which enabled the United States to survive the insurgency by Southern slave owners and their Wall Street backers and, even as the Civil War raged, to build the great Transcontinental Railroad which finally unified the nation; and it was instituted once again by President Franklin Roosevelt in the 1930s and 1940s, to pull the United States out of the Great Depression and create the “Arsenal of Democracy” to help win World War II.

Public credit for the Common Good was also the rock upon which Australia’s own National Bank, the Commonwealth Bank, was established in 1912 by Australian Labor Party MP King O’Malley, who proclaimed on 30 September 1909 in Parliament, “I am the [Alexander] Hamilton of Australia.” Prime Minister John Curtin and Treasurer Ben Chifley reasserted it to finance the Allied victory in the Pacific during World War II (including building a world-class machine tool industry from scratch), and it was to be the pivot upon which they intended a great postwar industrial and agricultural expansion of Australia, before the British-directed local financial oligarchy and the Privy Council in London overthrew those plans. (Both the Hamilton and O’Malley/Curtin/Chifley policies were presented in depth at the CEC’s March 2015 international conference, “The World Land-Bridge: Peace on Earth, Good Will towards All Men”.)

Such public credit for the Common Good has even taken place in the UK itself, as under the 1945–51 Labour government of Prime Minister Clement Attlee. Attlee nationalised the Bank of England for that purpose, and in the second reading of the Bank of England Bill on 29 October 1945 which accomplished that, his Chancellor of the Exchequer Hugh Dalton cited Australia’s successful government-owned Commonwealth Bank as a key precedent.

With the assistance of a nationalised central bank, Attlee’s government achieved: near-full employment; a 20 per cent increase in farm output between 1947 and 1952; nationalisation of 20 per cent of the economy, including (in addition to the Bank of England) civil aviation, coal mining, the railways, canals, communications, electricity and gas utilities, and the steel industry; the construction of a million new homes between 1945 and 1951; a comprehensive welfare system which alleviated the conditions of abject poverty suffered in the 1930s and drove significant improvements in public health, infant mortality and life expectancy; and the National Health Service, a publicly funded health care system which offered treatment free of charge for all, and treated 8.5 million people in 1948, its first year of operation (between 1948 and 1951 the government’s spending on health almost doubled from £6 billion to £11 billion).

Now, Jeremy Corbyn has put the issue of the deployment of public credit for the Common Good once again squarely on the agenda, and the bankers and their whores in the mass media and political parties are screaming bloody murder, the Blairites in the Labour Party as shrilly as the most rabid Tories. Why? Because “It won’t work”? No, precisely because it has worked in the past and will work again. But it will mean a tectonic shift in power away from the City of London, whose financial oligarchy managed the British Empire in its 19th-century heyday. Now assisted by its junior partner Wall Street and the IMF and World Bank, that British “informal financial empire” (in the words of its own apologists) still rules much of the world today.

From his own experience as Britain’s Chancellor of the Exchequer beginning in 1852, William Gladstone explained the ruling principle: “The hinge of the whole situation was this: the government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned.” Now, however, with the aid of the Corbyn campaign, as ordinary people are beginning to question the Money Power and how credit creation actually works, or should work, the private bankers are suffering their worst nightmare.

The simple facts of the matter

Continue reading →

Posted in AUSTRALIA, Financial Crisis, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , | 9 Comments

The two sides of science – RF Radiation Dangers

Posted on August 16, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

The theme of this post:
“It is estimated that 70 million couples are affected by infertility worldwide, and according to a 2014 study by the University of Exeter there is a strong link between exposure to electromagnetic radiation and a lower sperm count.”
Not the only danger though!

Stop Smart Meters Australia

Before we lead into the article that appeared in the Herald Sun about wireless armour underwear, the question we need to all ask ourselves is which side of science do we trust.

On one hand we are assured by industry and government departments that there are no dangers associated with exposure to wireless radiation from devices such as mobile phones, smart meters, tablets, laptops and other devices, some of which we carry close to our bodies everyday.

On the other hand we are cautioned about the dangers of wireless devices, with many scientists now linking the effects of microwave radiation to blood cell mutation when exposed to radio frequency emitting devices, as shown here and here.

So which side has a vested interest and is fully funded by industry?  You decide.

As you will read in the Herald Sun article reprinted below, there is now a strong link between fertility…

View original post 264 more words

Posted in ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, radiation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Global Warming? Climate Change? “A Rose by any other Name Smells the Same”

Posted on August 7, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Weird title? Weird times! Weird science! (Perhaps I mean a “skunk by any other name”?)

A selection of current WUWT posts, piling on the evidence of science being more important and stronger than rhetoric and propaganda.

Throwback Thursday: another failed “end of snow” climate prediction
Another proof of alarmist prediction being WRONG!

 

The Pause draws blood – A new record Pause length: no warming for 18 years 7 months

Highlights the manipulation of data to suit the agenda of the alarmists.

 

NOAA: Increased likelihood of below-normal Atlantic hurricane season

Proves that claims of serious weather pattern changes due to “warming” are not occurring at all!

 

Pocket-calculator climate model outperforms billion-dollar brains

Shows likelihood of alarmist computer models to be next to useless, not that we didn’t know that already.

 

HadCRUT4 joins the terrestrial temperature tamperers

More proof of “cooking the books”, hardly a scientific process!

 

‘Global warming the greatest scam in history’ claims founder of Weather Channel

John Coleman, who co-founded the Weather Channel, shocked academics by insisting the theory of man-made climate change was no longer scientifically credible.

 

 

Posted in AGW, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Human Behaviour, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

MSM To Pro-Vaxxers: Don’t Argue The Facts, Show Scary Pictures!

Posted on August 6, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

An ‘Activist Post’ article that deals with the human parameters, the attempts made to change the opinions of others, and the problems of people not understanding what they are being told. In other words “spin”, “cognitive dissonance” and perception.

Firstly, there are facts which most people can accept as such, then there is propaganda masquerading as fact, pushed by the MSM (Mainstream media), powered by the hugely powerful, “resourcefull” and generous pharmaceutical industry. [deliberate misspelling of ‘resourcefull’ to highlight the ‘fullness’ of the actual resouces].

When the propaganda is recognized for what it is, extreme efforts are apparently in order.

A pertinent extract: “Kloger does make an important point though. Most “anti-vaxxers” are unconvinced when confronted with the typical pro-vaccine argument. But that is not because they are necessarily rigid of belief, it is mostly because the typical pro-vaccine argument tends to be baseless propaganda, rooted in rhetoric instead of science.” [My bold emphasis].

An example of this is born out in this extract: “That’s a very noble goal, but it’s also one of the things that makes it so bloody hard to change their minds on the topic of vaccines. Public service campaigns don’t work; nor do one-on-one explanations of why the rumors about a vaccine-autism link are wrong. In some cases, there is even a backfire effect: the greater the effort expended to persuade the anti-vaxxers, the more convinced they become that they’re right.”

Note his  – “why the rumors about a vaccine-autism link are wrong“. This is a great example showing their own errors and twisted logic, and why the so-called “antivaxxers” refuse to respond. In fact, his so-called “rumours” are actually scientific evidence to which he and the industry have shut their minds. Why should we not think we are right, when we are actually right?

A good place to reiterate the other misleading mistake ‘they’ make, is the inaccurate and derogatory “anti-vaxxer”. Very few of the criticizers seriously oppose all vaccinations, all the time. Only a large number of aspects are considered as dangerous and unnecessary.

Some, if not many, of the criticizers are medical professionals, doctors and nurses. Does that not say something important?

MSM To Pro-Vaxxers: Don’t Argue The Facts, Show Scary Pictures!

By Brandon TurbevilleThe Vaccine industry, Big Pharma, and the mainstream media have some advice for vaccine zealots attempting to bully parents questioning the safety or effectiveness of vaccines into changing their minds – Don’t argue the facts! Show scary pictures!

In what can only be described as an instruction manual as to how to shame, bully, and shout a person down who simply has a different take on the best and safest way to raise their children, it is clear that the religion of vaccines and “scientism” now has the hallmark of any faith determined to spread itself – the presence of evangelicals.

The new vaccine evangelical movement is being provided with a script sheet of what to say and what to avoid when attempting to convert others to their belief system. Like most religions, the goal among the leaders and the zealots is a world where differing modes of thought no longer exist and where other opinions no longer force them to question the way they view that world.

Articles like “How To Change An Anti-Vaxxer’s Mind” by Jeffrey Kloger of TIME, are a perfect example of the recent propaganda blitz coming from the mainstream media. Kloger’s article is being quickly copied and rewritten in mainstream media outlets all across the country with the real vitriol being found in the more trendy hipster markets.

The recent propaganda push is being based upon a study by researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It’s not certain exactly how much time and effort was put into the study to discover what most undergraduate marketing students and any remotely successful politician, salesman, or sociopath already knows – that scary pictures are more effective at convincing hordes of people of an idea (true or false) than facts, reasoning, or logic.

 In other words, the study and the mainstream media have determined that it is best to go after the emotional vulnerabilities of those who are either under-researched, on the fence, or who have been subjected to bullying and social pressure since hipsters and the cool kids realized it was the “in” thing this year to attack “anti-vaxxers.”

Consider the passage by Jeffrey Kloger of TIME who writes,

That’s a very noble goal, but it’s also one of the things that makes it so bloody hard to change their minds on the topic of vaccines. Public service campaigns don’t work; nor do one-on-one explanations of why the rumors about a vaccine-autism link are wrong. In some cases, there is even a backfire effect: the greater the effort expended to persuade the anti-vaxxers, the more convinced they become that they’re right.

So it’s extremely good news that researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign may at last have come up with a way to cut through the misinformation and get the truth across: Don’t just tell parents to vaccinate their children, show them what happens if they don’t.

In other words: Don’t argue with them! Just show scary pictures! The hope is to catch someone unaware, in a weakened state, or someone who is unfortunately not as well-versed on the subject.

Of course, if you can’t convince someone by providing facts, logic, and reasoning there is always the chance that the person is irrational. But there is also the very real chance that they are quite lucid and that you, in fact, armed with all your talking points, media-induced outrage, and perceived intellectual superiority, are simply wrong.

Kloger does make an important point though. Most “anti-vaxxers” are unconvinced when confronted with the typical pro-vaccine argument. But that is not because they are necessarily rigid of belief, it is mostly because the typical pro-vaccine argument tends to be baseless propaganda, rooted in rhetoric instead of science. As for the social aspect, if “anti-vaxxers” didn’t abandon their beliefs when the first few waves of obnoxious Big-Pharma propaganda came blasting through the airwaves, they are generally not impressed when their friends, family, or even complete strangers take it upon themselves to give them a regurgitation of the talking points they heard about vaccines on NPR, CNN, or read in TIME magazine.

After all, social shaming and bullying – if one’s opinions are strong enough – tend to produce the opposite of the desired effect.

This idea of showing scary pictures, however, is not just a rudimentarily effective propaganda method, it can also be quite dangerous, particularly when the scary pictures are being broadcast over every outlet in the mainstream media.

Take the spate of articles posted in the New York Times, for example. Propaganda narratives like “My Patient Doesn’t ‘Do’ Vaccines,” “The Dangers Of Vaccine Denial,” “A Discredited Vaccine Study’s Continuing Impact On Public Health,” are all aimed at painting the science surrounding the numerous demonstrations of vaccine dangers as pseudo-science and parents who question the safety of vaccines as delusional, obsessive, Luddites. They are designed to produce a false consensus within society that vaccines are safe and effective. Basically, they are designed to create a self-fulfilling prophecy – if enough people read the propaganda and believe it, particularly if they think the majority of others believe it, the victim population will come to believe the propaganda.

Now, apparently, the New York Times and its ilk will be sharing scary pictures to go along with their tripe.

Of course, we all know what happened the last time the New York Times posted scary pictures and emotional words. Maybe one day we will finally leave Iraq….

Image credit: farsight 3

Recently from Brandon Turbeville:

Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, and The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria. Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV.  He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com. 

This article may be re-posted in full with attribution

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, Vaccinations, vaccines, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Massive strike hits Aussie airports as Abbott plans pay cuts for customs and immigration staff

Posted on August 5, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Unrest at the airports points to extreme government attacks on wages and conditions for these workers.
Each day Tony Abbott’s actions seem to move closer to dictatorship and lack of respect and obligation to Australian citizens.
Will the people remember these things come the next election?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment