This issue, as I said recently, needs to be highlighted as a global threat, one which people can understand, if they want to, and act on. Again, if they want to.
(Other global threats such as “terrorism” and “climate change” are beyond our personal abilities to fully understand and certainly to individually tackle).
The vaccination issue, however, presents ample opportunity for both individual understanding and participation. That works both ways – if, after reasonable attempts at educating oneself, a decision to support (or not), you and your kids being vaccinated, is in your control. Well, in a sensible world, that would be the case.
To remove parental choice is a very serious action, to do so when valid doubts, to say the least, are evident, flies in the face of commonsense, decency and humanity.
Many laws which are restrictive in some way, for example, for vehicle seat belts and against excessive road speeds, can be accepted as a mandatory on the basis that much good is a valid expectation and any inconveniences are minor.
These criteria are not met in the mandatory vaccination case, as clearly exampled here. The ‘good’ is conditional, damage is being done!
From ‘VacTruth‘, two information sources that tell us that all is not well in the vaccine industry or the political agenda area.
- Difficult to fault Robert F. Kennedy Jnr, as an information source. (Article by Christina England).
Profit over Safety – Centers for Disease Control Names 271 New Vaccinations
In a recent article published by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., titled Children at Risk – Vaccines, Government & Big Pharma’s Dirty Money, [1] he highlighted the fact that every vaccine introduced to the vaccine schedule guarantees its manufacturer millions of customers, increasing vaccine revenue by billions of dollars. However, it appears that a minimum of 56 doses of 14 vaccinations before the age of eighteen is not quite lucrative enough for the pharmaceutical industry, as according to Mr. Kennedy’s research, the CDC has 271 new vaccinations under development in the hopes that vaccine revenues will reach a staggering $100 billion by 2025.
Kennedy called the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “a cesspool of corruption, mismanagement and dysfunction,” making it crystal clear to readers that financial gain fueled their decision making.
Read the complete article, where he convincingly supports his accusations, (here).
2. Another compelling article, from the ‘Vactruth’ Facebook page. https://www.facebook.com/vaccinetruth/posts/10153152459157989:0
Update! *Pertussis Vaccine is Causing Pertusses*
http://bit.ly/1GD7lvI
Date: Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM
To: Melissa_Fett@roberts.senate.gov
Hi Melissa,
We met in Washington on June 4 of this year to discuss the potential to get a Senate hearing on the falsified case definition of Lyme disease, which is likely causing thousands of Kansans to go undiagnosed and untreated. Today I have an even more urgent issue.
The current pertussis outbreak in Kansas caught my eye, as it has been reported that 100% of the pertussis cases occurred in previously vaccinated individuals.This is a clear indication that something may be wrong with the vaccine, and I find it particularly curious that this outbreak is happening during the time of year when kids are getting their back-to-school vaccines.
Here is the article that caught my eye:
http://www.inquisitr.com/…/reno-countys-relentless-whoopin…/
“Reno County health officials are looking into over 70 cases of suspected whooping cough and have urged every single resident who has been coughing for more than two weeks to get checked by their doctor. Reno County, Kansas is not the only area of the country dealing with a surge in pertussis lately; cases have been climbing in recent years. On July 27, KWCH reported that the health department reported that all of the confirmed cases were people who were fully vaccinated, mirroring the initial outbreak that occurred at a high school in Falmouth, Cape Cod, Massachusetts last fall and other pockets of outbreaks around the country.”
Now, you may recall what we said about the Lyme vaccine having had a component that is immunosuppressive. In technical terms, it is a TLR2 agonist, or a fungal-type antigen. What these antigens do is cause an initial cytokine storm, which is then down-regulated by the immune system to prevent death from sepsis. Here is a published research article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25353353 I found yesterday which says that,
“Filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) is a major adhesion and virulence factor of Bordetella pertussis and also a main component of acellular pertussis vaccines.”
and,
“Native FHA was found to strongly stimulate TLR2, but not TLR4 or TLR5 transfected cells. Among recombinant FHA fragments only the fragment spanning amino acid residues 1544-1917 was able to exhibit the TLR2 stimulating property of FHA. Interaction of FHA with TLR2 suggests its involvement in induction of the innate immune system against Bordetella pertussis.”
So, you can imagine my alarm at realizing that the current pertussis vaccines are exhibiting the exact same mechanism as the LYMErix vaccine which was pulled from the market in 2001. Substantial research exists to support this mechanism, and is available to the general public. What this means to us right now is that the Tdap and Dtap vaccines do not prevent illness, and are actually causing more illness, as well as permanent immunosuppression.
Since people are so passionate on both sides of the vaccine debate, I can understand how the Senator may be reluctant to appear to take sides. However, these particular vaccines containing acellular pertussis can be conclusively shown to cause harm. I ask that immediate action be taken to stop administration of these vaccines before more children are made ill.
Thank you,
Jennifer Lyme
One more thing, and there are so many. To throw in one of my favourite questions, to which no-one has yet commented, what I consider is one of the most damning indictments on the high risk issues, that is recommended by the pharmaceutical industry, approved by the “watch-dog’ authorities, not questioned by doctors and apparently ignored by nursing staff etc.,
“Why, if in the case of all ingested medicines, recommended doses are regulated by either age or body weight, but in the case of vaccines, dosages are the same from prem babies, [2kg] (subject to some criteria), right through to fully grown adolescents, say 70Kg? Why? I ask.
Reference https://tgrule.com/2014/07/27/vaccine-product-inserts/
Merck – RECOMBIVAX HB is a vaccine indicated for prevention of infection
caused by all known subtypes of hepatitis B virus.
“2.1 Dosage and Schedule RECOMBIVAX HB:
Persons from birth through 19 years of age: A series of 3 doses (0.5 mL each) given on a 0-, 1-, and 6-month schedule.”
[What do readers think about a newborn baby receiving the same dose as a 19 year old adult?]
“5.3 Infants Weighing Less Than 2000 g
Hepatitis B vaccination should be delayed until 1 month of age or hospital discharge in infants weighing <2000 g if the mother is documented to be HBsAg negative at the time of the infant’s birth.”
[What do readers think about this criteria? Firstly, less than 2000gm – delay vaccination, 2010gm – apparently ok. Secondly, if mother not HBsAg negative, apparently no minimum weight limitation]
The GOLDEN RULE 