From Mike Adams, ‘Natural News‘.
(NaturalNews) If you have ever seen the famous 1975 movie One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, you likely recall several disturbing scenes in which mental health patients are given frontal-lobe lobotomies, or the iconic scene where actor Jack Nicholson‘s character undergoes electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Today, these horrific forms of so-called mental health treatment are considered to be cruel relics of the past, but a new bill in Australia proposes that young children be given these treatments without parental consent, and even be permitted to undergo sterilization procedures without parental consent.
The Government of Western Australia‘s Mental Health Commission (WAMHC) has basically conjured up a proposal for new mental health legislation that bypasses parental involvement in the mental health treatment process, and instead tasks children under age 18, and of any age, with making the decision about whether or not to be sterilized, or whether or not to have their brain tissue destroyed with psychosurgery procedures. If a “mental health professional” can convince children that they need such treatments for their own good, in other words, than Australia’s youngest members of society will be open game for the eugenicist agenda.
It almost sounds like the plot of a sick movie, but it is all true and fully documented right in the WAMHC Mental Health Bill 2011, which you can access here: http://www.mentalhealth.wa.gov.au
There is much more information in the article, linked here.
Also included are contact details where Australian citizens can submit comments. Unfortunately, the closing date for official acceptance of comments is today, (9 March). Maybe you comments would still be justified and filed.
Related articles
- Sterilisation and Electroshock Therapy on Our Kids is OK in WA! (newsworldwide.wordpress.com)
- Effects of Bullying On Your Child’s Mental Health: Advice For Parents And Caregivers (education.com)
- The lingering shadow of eugenics (traditionalchristianity.wordpress.com)
The GOLDEN RULE 
I just viewed the ‘Activist Post’ video I have added to the ‘related articles’ list.
Max Igan makes a good case for the law to be vehemently opposed.
In passing, he mentions Australia as being a testing ground for unpopular government restrictions, something I had never considered. (Although we were the guinea pigs for the UK nuclear weapon tests way back).
In this context, he brings up banning weapons from public ownership and relates the Port Arthur massacre as being what I think the americans call a “Psy-ops” incident. Deliberate plan to condition the public into accepting the unacceptable.
One of the reasons Pauline Hansen was shafted out of politics by our current hoping-to-be-next PM, Tony Abbot. She didn’t believe the ‘ubiquitous’ official story and got set up for removal.
Similar to another parlimentarian who dared to mention that he didn’t believe the official 9/11 story and blamed Mossad. I had no idea we had such a strong Zionist power in our own Australian parliament. He was brought swiftly to his knees. Julia called him stupid. Even if he was, and he isn’t, at least he is not corrupt and a liar.
When the dust settles over the Syria, Iran and global warming scam issues, I might be able to direct some energy closer to home.
Wonderful goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just too magnificent. I really like what you have acquired here, really like what you are saying and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it smart. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is actually a wonderful website.
Hmmm! Flattery, it seems, will get you some places. I accept your comment in good faith but I am wary of being used. Benefit of the doubt here, I say thanks, and your website gets a mention as a “Services’ link.