EPA the Wrecking Ball.


Thanks WUWT!

In agreement with just about all this post. In essence it sums up the situation very well.
Except: Regarding solar and wind power deficiencies – Part time energy is not necessarily enough reason to rubbish it. Any energy from true renewable sources is worthwhile, providing the embedded energy in manufacture is outweighed by the energy output. Whatever energy is produced is indisputably a clean source, and reduces the amount required from “fossil” fuels. There is nothing wrong with that.

Why should we not expect future research to result in much higher efficiencies from solar? Over a Kilowatt per square meter begging to be converted more efficiently! Part time, yes but everlasting (sort of) and free!
Alan calls wind power structures ugly. I disagree, I see them as magnificent. They are certainly far, far more aesthetic than the high voltage power distribution towers and all the poles and cables associated with above-ground distribution.
Regarding nuclear, again I am not in agreement. Given the possibility that coal and gas supplies are perhaps not in such short supply as claimed ( Check out “Peak Oil, or continuous supply?“), and perhaps not as environmentally damaging as claimed, nuclear would be better left alone until we develop safer systems. (IMHO). Or forever, if better alternatives become available.

Watts Up With That?

Guest post By Alan Caruba

The Environmental Protection Agency is using its power to advance the objective of the environmental movement to deny Americans access to the energy that sustains the nation’s economy and is using the greatest hoax ever perpetrated, global warming—now called “climate change”—to achieve that goal.

“This standard isn’t the once-and-for-all solution to our environmental challenge,” said Lisa Jackson, the EPA administrator, “but it is an important commonsense step toward tackling the ongoing and very real threat of climate change and protecting the future for generations to come. It will enhance the lives of our children and our children’s children.”

This is a boldfaced lie. Its newest rule is based on the debasement of science that is characterized and embodied in the global warming hoax. It will deprive America of the energy it requires to function.

Since the 1980s the Greens have been telling everyone that carbon…

View original post 806 more words

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, nuclear, World Issues and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to EPA the Wrecking Ball.

  1. In suggesting oil as “perhaps not as environmentally damaging as claimed” I am referring to its combustion. In no way will I condone the criminal environmental damage resulting from the unsafe underwater drilling and associated, blatant disregard for the safety of humans and wildlife by the oil companies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s