Well, there we go! Due acknowledgements to Clare (JustMeInT) and to ACM (Australian Climate Madness) from which the following is reblogged.
Crux of the matter is that all along I, and many others, have been pointing out that the global warming movement is a scam based on a methodology of creating world government domination. This Scientific American article spells it out. How anyone can fail to see the truth amazes me. If readers are still in doubt after reading this, spend some more time at the ACM blog, where specific Australian activities are reported.
If you thought ‘world government’ is a conspiracy theory…
Monday, 19 March 2012 8:02 am · 21 comments
by Simon
To all those smug warmists who crow that those filthy deniers, who claim the climate ‘crisis’ is being used as a convenient socio-political tool to implement a system of world government, are just indulging in crazy conspiracy theories, Scientific American sets us all straight:
Effective World Government Will Be Needed to Stave Off Climate Catastrophe“Human societies must now change course and steer away from critical tipping points in the Earth system that might lead to rapid and irreversible change. This requires fundamental reorientation and restructuring of national and international institutions toward more effective Earth system governance and planetary stewardship.”
…
“If we are ever to cope with climate change in any fundamental way, radical solutions on the social side are where we must focus, though.”
…
“To be effective, a new set of institutions would have to be imbued with heavy-handed, transnational enforcement powers.“
It’s a little difficult to avoid conclusions about the aim of social re-engineering and world government when it is spelled out so clearly. If you don’t want conspiracy theories to emerge, stop your warmist friends from providing the substance on which they are based – simple.
Read it here.
Related articles
- Effective World Government Will Be Needed to Stave Off Climate Catastrophe (3eintelligence.wordpress.com)
- Climate Change and World Government (merovee.wordpress.com)
- Finally Somebody Comes Right Out And Says It: Climate + World governance is a match made in green heaven (tarpon.wordpress.com)
The GOLDEN RULE 
Ken,
Did you read this?
Its a draft constitution for the UN’s world government. Its drafted by one of their subsiduaries.
Click to access un-world-constitution-draft.pdf
Cheers
Roger
http://www.rogerfromnewzealand.wordpress.com
Thanks Roger, will comment further soon. Ken
Thanks Ken!
The Vostok ice cores (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age) show a 400,000 year pattern of glaciation and temperature variations where temperatures (CO2 & Dust concentration) gradually increased to a maximum and then suddenly dropped with extreme regularity approximately every 125,000 years (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vostok_Petit_data.svg).
Carbon credits are a scam, and back in the late 1980s, the “political science” idea was for a distribution of wealth from developed countries that required extra credits to developing countries which had excess credits. Al Gore was to broker most of the trades – for a fee!
Great Ken,
Hope you are having a good read.
For instance check out Article 33 on Page 103 where they start talking about population control.
Great incriminating document! ALso note how they want to gain control by controlling land? (Article 31 P 10)
In you city, have you noticed the property prices climbing higher, and your government saying that they will do something about it but nothing ever happens? Like they could relax city limits for more residential land, cut red tape for building and stop enforcing foolishly high standards of new housing.
Well this describes my city exactly. I’m building a house right now and would you believe that among a host of incredibly expensive requirments like cavity walls, double glazing and very high standard of insulation, (It hardly ever even snows here!), they even specify the distance between the oven door and the nearest wall or bench!
There has been no relaxing of city limits and the red tape for creating residential land is horredous.
Like the above constitution and Agenda21 and ICLEI we are being pushed gradually from our land to expensive but “sustainable” high rise housing. Our local government is simply a faithful pawn of the UN.
http://www.iclei.org/
These are pages on my city council’s website.
Click to access SustainabilityPolicy-docs.pdf
http://www.ccc.govt.nz/thecouncil/policiesreportsstrategies/strategies/healthyenvironmentstrategies/climatesmart/climatechangeresources.aspx http://www.ccc.govt.nz/thecouncil/policiesreportsstrategies/strategies/healthyenvironmentstrategies/climatesmart/climatechangeresources.aspx#jumplink7
http://www.transitiontowns.org.nz/groups
Does your community have a “Transition town” movement?
Cheers
Roger
http://www.rogerfromnewzealand.wordpress.com
Haven’t had time to do this justice.
Looking at your reference –
“The provision includes four mandatory actions, although the list is not exhaustive. Subparagraph
(a) contains a two-fold obligation for each Party: the first is to conduct a regular census of
its population and then on the basis of the results to estimate the carrying capacity of its environment;
the second is to develop or strengthen appropriate programmes adapting population growth
accordingly. The means of so doing are left to the discretion of each Party, consistent with other
international obligations. Subparagraph (b) addresses the specific problem of population flows creating
stress on natural systems. It calls for cooperation between States because of the transboundary
environmental problems that may result, although it would also cover the situation where other States
could also assist in coping with the unmanageable population flows, for example by resettlement.
In this context, Subparagraph (c) provides for assistance in cases where rapid population growth
outpaces the necessary infrastructure to support it. Other States are only required to contribute to
establishing such an infrastructure, not to ensure a specific result. Subparagraph (d) gives effect
to individual choice by requiring full information to be provided on the options concerning family
planning consistent with international human rights obligations.286 In view of cultural differences
concerning this issue, the intent of the provision is to require the Party to provide information on
those options that are available in the particular Party; it is not intended to dictate which forms of
family planning are acceptable.287”
This part “to develop or strengthen appropriate programmes adapting population growth
accordingly.” is particularly interesting.
It all seems to represent absolute control over people, including mandatory relocation to ?where?
Somehow I get the feeling of not wanting to read more!
Yup and see how Agenda 21 fits in.
“Taking into account, in particular, the Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment, the
World Charter for Nature, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development and Agenda
21, the Millennium Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly, and the Johannesburg
Declaration and Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development;”
The introduction to the objectives.
And they are going to control land and therefore food! Note Article 31
Cheers
Roger
http://www.rogerfromnewzealand.wordpress.com