Vaccinations – No Unchallenged Justification for Mandatory Enforcement.

Posted on November 20, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

One more post on this topic and I will give it a rest. Basically an offering of my own viewpoints and conclusions.

An issue of immense ramifications, an endless number of information sources and interested parties, of major health consequences, of enormous financial outcomes and of much political significance.
There are many reasons to question many aspects of the vaccine industry and associated authorities and practices. Reasons provided by medical experts whose qualifications and experience validate their opinions. Persons without financial or political agendas, who are capable of clear thinking and logical reasoning.

A situation of “reasonable doubt” exists. Ignoring this fact is contrary to commonsense; acting in ignorance of, or in conflict with this fact, is unscientific, uncivilized and potentially dangerous to humanity.

It is suggested that there is sufficient evidence to seriously question and also to oppose the global program of enforced mandatory vaccinations, in particular the removal of logical exemptions.

From the website of CDC, ‘Centers of Disease Control and Prevention’:

Additional Facts:

Additives used in the production of vaccines may include suspending fluid (e.g. sterile water, saline, or fluids containing protein); preservatives and stabilizers to help the vaccine remain unchanged (e.g. albumin, phenols, and glycine); and adjuvants or enhancers to help the vaccine to be more effective.

Common substances found in vaccines include:

Aluminum gels or salts of aluminum which are added as adjuvants to help the vaccine stimulate a better response. Adjuvants help promote an earlier, more potent response, and more persistent immune response to the vaccine.
Antibiotics which are added to some vaccines to prevent the growth of germs (bacteria) during production and storage of the vaccine. No vaccine produced in the United States contains penicillin.
Egg protein is found in influenza and yellow fever vaccines, which are prepared using chicken eggs. Ordinarily, persons who are able to eat eggs or egg products safely can receive these vaccines.
Formaldehyde is used to inactivate bacterial products for toxoid vaccines, (these are vaccines that use an inactive bacterial toxin to produce immunity.) It is also used to kill unwanted viruses and bacteria that might contaminate the vaccine during production. Most formaldehyde is removed from the vaccine before it is packaged.
Monosodium glutamate (MSG) and 2-phenoxy-ethanol which are used as stabilizers in a few vaccines to help the vaccine remain unchanged when the vaccine is exposed to heat, light, acidity, or humidity.
Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative that is added to vials of vaccine that contain more than one dose to prevent contamination and growth of potentially harmful bacteria.

For children with a prior history of allergic reactions to any of these substances in vaccines, parents should consult their child’s healthcare provider before vaccination.

Bold emphases are mine and highlight the items that should particularly concern parents.  Even ‘antibiotics’ are questionable considering that we are trying to minimize their use because antibiotics resistance is becoming a real problem. Adding multiple doses to babies and children’s bodies has potential negative ramifications.

Insufficient or inadequate testing precludes a statistically valid basis for the industry to claim “vaccines are safe and effective”. Perhaps they may be “safe”? most of the time, “effective” most of the time, but therefore can only be correctly termed relatively “safe and effective”.

But there are genuine reasons for asking if the ‘price’ paid by some, is morally and ethically acceptable in order to achieve the “greater good”?

The claim of known recognized toxic elements contained in vaccines being only a small and insignificant risk to babies and children because they are “trace amounts” is unproven. In fact, there are substantial proofs that they are causing harm.
Harm admitted by the manufacturers and overseeing authorities, harm officially recognized in legal court dealings, harm experienced by a small but important number of families. Harm which is readily seen in the case of the HPV vaccines, harm which is scientifically challengable in both multi-vaccine doses, and administering more than one vaccine in a session.

Are the numbers of harmed individuals relatively small? Even 1 in a million is too many for that 1 case to feel justice. But there are in fact many! Many more than the official statistics take into account. It is reasonably estimated that non-recognition and non-reporting of cases make the official figures less than 10% (at best) of real cases.

Regarding the “greater good”, numerous compelling arguments dispute the necessity for vaccines in many cases, the effectiveness of the vaccines in several cases and the justification for mandatory application of vaccines in general.

Regarding the “trace amount” argument, as mentioned above, there are no authentic trial results to prove a “safe” conclusion. For some inexplicable reason(s), doses of vaccines are not regulated for babies and children in step with their body weight and they in fact receive the same as young adults. Yet doses of any oral medicines are regulated for children. Why is that so?

Also re “trace amounts”, besides being basically untested and therefore an unknown risk, scientists (some), authorities and people in general are quite happy to accept a strong “scientific” conclusion that 400 parts per million, a 0.04% trace amount, of CO2 in our atmosphere, regulates our planetary global temperature.

There is no justification for the public to be coerced into a compulsory health program without due consideration for adverse reactions, allergies, state of health or personal or religious beliefs. Any considerations of such matters are to unjustly ignore the significance of the criticisms and to discard them.

If the medical justifications are not sufficiently compelling for the vast majority of members of the public to voluntarily accept vaccinations, the reasons for the doubts must be dealt with.
Not by denial, but by data and authentic scientific studies which are above criticism. Such proofs do not exist to the degree that ethically and morally justify mandatory vaccinations.

Without any guarantee of safety (there is none!), should we accept authoritarian laws that take away parent’s rights to care for their own children?

It is mooted that adults may soon be targeted with similar mandatory vaccination requirements. That would be even greater extraordinary authoritarian behaviour from our leaders. Even less justification and even more invasive of our civil liberties!

There you have my opinions.  (Substantially supported by industry whistle-blowers and recognized professionals).

References:
CDC http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm
Vaccine Truth http://vactruth.com/
Vaccine xchange http://vaccinexchange.org/
Natural News: http://www.naturalnews.com/
Natural Society http://naturalsociety.com/search_gcse/?q=vaccines
Australian Vaccination-skeptics Network (AVN) https://avn.org.au/
Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1m3TjokVU4

Posted in AGENDA 21, AUSTRALIA, drugs & medication, HEALTH, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Study: Vaccinated Children Have 2 to 5 Times More Diseases and Disorders Than Unvaccinated Children

Posted on November 18, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Genuine expert information to give cause to open-minded consideration.

Mandatory vaccinations are far from fair, safe, necessary, ethical or justified.

by David Michael Augenstein
Journal of Natural Food and Health

A German study released in September 2011 of about 8000 UNVACCINATED children, newborn to 19 years, show vaccinated children have at least 2 to 5 times more diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children.

The results are presented in the bar chart below; the complete data and study results are here. The data is compared to the national German KIGGS health study of the children in the general population. Most of the respondents to the survey were from the U.S.

The data was collected from parents with vaccine-free children via an internet questionnaire by vaccineinjury.info and Andreas Bachmair, a German classical homeopathic practitioner. The website is not a pretty one (including Google ads for vaccines) but the actual data is what counts. The independent study is self-funded and is not sponsored by a large “credible” non-profit or government health organization with political and financial conflicts of interest. Each one of the 8000 cases are actual cases with medical documentation. Three other studies had similar results according to Bachmair and are reported below.

No study of health outcomes of vaccinated people versus unvaccinated has ever been conducted in the U.S. by CDC or any other agency in the 50 years or more of an accelerating schedule of vaccinations (now over 50 doses of 14 vaccines given before kindergarten, 26 doses in the first year). Most data collected by CDC is contained in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database. The VAERS is generally thought to contain only 3 to 5 percent of reportable incidents. This is simply because only some immediate reactions are reported by doctors; but many are not admitted to be reactions to the vaccine. Most importantly, the VAERS numbers are only immediate reactions, which I would place with a few hours to a few weeks. Long-term vaccine-induced diseases and disorders are not recognized by parents or doctors when these conditions develop perhaps a few months to five years or more and would never be realized to come from multiple vaccinations. In other words, many children and adults have diseases and disorders that are vaccine induced and they never suspect they are from the vaccines, as this study indicates.

– See more at: http://healthimpactnews.com/2011/new-study-vaccinated-children-have-2-to-5-times-more-diseases-and-disorders-than-unvaccinated-children/#sthash.qi07guUh.dpuf

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, Public Health, Vaccination Dangers | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Parliament of Australia – Mandatory Vaccinations – Democrazy!

Posted on November 16, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

A post concerning mandatory vaccinations becoming law in Australia.
This is the way our Australian democracy works – A committee is advised what the government wants and then hold an inquiry that confirms and upholds the desired end result.
Evidence of serious issues are ignored:

NO consideration of the health status of the recipients.
NO consideration for the basic rights of parents.
No consideration for the rights of the child.
NO consideration for the absence of proven safety of individual vaccines and especially that of multiple applications.
NO consideration for establishing the need for particular vaccines in different situations.
NO regard for information provided in the public submissions which were, in the committee’s own words “The majority of the correspondence received was from individuals who oppose the bill.”
So far removed from logic, science and commonsense that it points to a hidden agenda being enacted.
“Democrazy” is a more appropriate interpretation.
Not only a mockery of justice, but an insult to Australians.
How does this sound? “As part of this measure, the Government announced it would provide a $26 million boost to the Immunise Australia program ‘to encourage doctors and immunisation providers to identify and vaccinate children in their practice who are overdue’.[6]”
I am interested to see how spending on enforced vaccinations can be offset by “1.21 The Explanatory Memorandum notes that the Bill is expected to produce savings of $508.3 million over the forward estimates.[21]” If this is calculated to be savings from healthier children and less work sickies, perhaps they have forgotten the health costs of dealing with adverse reaction issues which may even exceed any known-to-be-fallible and non-guaranteed benefits of vaccinating.
The committee judgment does not go unchallenged, even by its peers! “ 1.22 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights (PJCHR) found the Bill engages and places limits on the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as set out in article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and sought advice from the Minister on whether the measures were justifiable.[22] The PJCHR had not published the Minister’s response prior to the tabling of this report.”

Conduct of the inquiry
1.2 Details of the inquiry, including a link to the Bill and associated documents, were placed on the committee’s website. The committee also wrote to 31 organisations and individuals, inviting submissions by 16 October 2015.
1.3 The committee received over 2000 pieces of correspondence related to the inquiry, which included submissions, form letters and short general statements. The majority of the correspondence received was from individuals who oppose the bill.
1.4 On 28 October 2015 the committee determined to publish the following statement on the inquiry page:
The committee has received a large volume of submissions in relation to this inquiry and wishes to assure submitters that each piece of correspondence to the inquiry is being read and considered. The committee has decided to publish all submissions from organisations and a representative sample of the submissions received from individuals. Owing to the sensitive and personal nature of many submissions, the committee has decided that the representative sample will be drawn from those for which it has received clear advice from the submitter supporting publication. The committee has decided not to publish submissions comprising short or general statements, form/campaign letters and petitions, but has noted the concerns raised in them.
1.5 The committee published 550 submissions, including 25 submissions received from organisations. The committee also published two samples of form letters. The committee considered and noted all other unpublished correspondence.[2]
1.6 The committee held a public hearing in Brisbane on 2 November 2015.

Posted in AUSTRALIA, Politics, Vaccination Dangers | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Corrupted Australian Surface Temperature Records

Posted on November 16, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Just to keep the Australian scene available to the public.
A bit technical but it provides a contrast to the warmist propaganda!

Posted in AGW, AUSTRALIA, climate change, Corruption, ENVIRONMENT | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Climate Change Inquisition Begins

Posted on November 12, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

An interesting title, a post on ‘The FEDERALIST’ category “Global Warming“.

For me, this adds another opportunity to “beat my head against a brick wall”, as a friend highlighted and something of which I am constantly aware. “Brick wall” it certainly is, as is shown in this article.

Not a material barrier but one of enormous substance nevertheless.

Its main elements are political motivation; virtually unlimited funding; professional academics prepared to depart from honest scientific principles, or unbelievably unable to understand that they have departed from them; media, both scientific and mainstream, with very few exceptions, deliberately refraining from what should include a healthy proportion of investigative journalism, or even balanced reporting, an essential component of the responsibility of a public information source. Probably true to add the failure of the general public to be critical in their absorbing of information and trusting the newspapers and governments who themselves are naive at very best, or corrupt at worst.

Unfortunately, part of this mix includes unscrupulous behaviour, a distinct absence of ethics and, in too many cases, downright lies.

In case the reader is inclined to a conclusion that these opinions are the product of a raving activist, it needs to be pointed out that there exists a wealth of knowledge and evidence from a great many completely balanced, unbiased and highly educated scientists, some belonging to sound technical organizations, some individuals simply seeking honesty and justice, and a long list of internet blog sites that openly provide scientific proofs and/or hypotheses that genuinely contest much of the claimed science of the IPCC group and its followers.

The leading blog site would have to be WUWT, with their 33,000+ followers and 250,000,000 views and endless supply of meaningful information.

On my blog alone, many internet links are listed. Hundreds of posts, searchable by “AGW”, “climate change” or “global warming”, and pages in the drop-down menu header “AGW”, shows the amount of reading and research that supports the formation of my beliefs and enthusiasm for promoting a factual and unbiassed critique of the official “climate change” debacle.

Arriving at the title subject, [at last, 🙂 ], the justification for claiming  the existence of an ‘inquisition’. (In its strongest meaning according to https://www.google.com.au/search?q=inquisition+definition&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=4wlEVvH9AsWOmwXGy5jADg,

“an ecclesiastical tribunal established by Pope Gregory IX circa 1232 for the suppression of heresy. It was active chiefly in northern Italy and southern France, becoming notorious for the use of torture. In 1542 the papal Inquisition was revived to combat Protestantism, eventually becoming an organ of papal government.”)

we see here the first part, “suppression of heresy” in action with the CAGW warmists branding anybody who questions their “science” and conclusions as heretics. Hopefully the “torture” stage will never be seen but coercion in the form of finance and job security does, and as in this case, some extremists propose legal action and punishment of so-called “deniers”. (BTW, another ridiculous use of a word, along with “climate change”, a term referring to an absolutely normal global phenomena, being corrupted to mean “catastrophic man-made climate influence”.  Another pathetic, unsupportable claim introduced by desperate people).

New York’s attorney general, Eric Schneiderman, has started an investigation of Exxon Mobil “to determine whether the company lied to the public about the risks of climate change or to investors about how such risks might hurt the oil business.” According to The New York Times, its sources “said the inquiry would include a period of at least a decade during which Exxon Mobil funded outside groups that sought to undermine climate science.” See what they did there? To have a different view of climate science is to “undermine” it because there is no scientific study of the climate except that which they agree with.

We should start with the observation that Exxon could not possibly have “lied” about climate change, even if it intended to, because first there would have to be a proven truth on the subject. If the company later contradicted warnings about global warming issued by scientists it funded in the 1980s, that would be justified by the fact that those warnings were almost certainly wrong. The arguments for global warming have been undercut — not by anything Exxon did — but by what the earth didn’t do. It didn’t keep warming, with global temperatures leveling off for the past 15 to 20 years. Global temperatures are now trending at or below the lowest, least dire predictions of warming.

But this isn’t really about the science, is it? To make it clear that this is entirely a political witch hunt, the Times explains that “the company published extensive research over decades that largely lined up with mainstream climatology. Thus, any potential fraud prosecution might depend on exactly how big a role company executives can be shown to have played in directing campaigns of climate denial, usually by libertarian-leaning political groups.”

Voila! Consensus!

A Bloomberg analysis describes the “weird theory” needed to transform this into a case of securities fraud but gets down to the nub of why Schneiderman is pursuing that theory: to evade the First Amendment. “[S]ecurities fraud is perhaps the least protected speech of all. Securities law fits notoriously uncomfortably with the First Amendment; the Securities and Exchange Commission forbids even truthful speech by companies in many situations.”

So there you go. This is about suppressing political speech by using the threat of government prosecution to intimidate corporations into withdrawing funding from pro-free-market advocates.

This is part of the whole “consensus” scam that is central to global warming hysteria. The idea is to make it impossible for scientists who are skeptical of global warming to receive any funding or get published in peer-reviewed journals — and then declare that, lo and behold, there are no published scientists who are skeptical about global warming! The idea is to proclaim a spontaneous “consensus” that you created by excluding anyone who disagrees with you.

The complete article is linked here.

I wonder how readers react to realizing that we live in a civilization, (by the way, nowadays a misnomer as any civility from our authoritarian leaders is often difficult to discern), that resorts to legal force to pursue a program seriously threatening peoples welfare and well-being, which is based on false premises.Featured Image -- 17552

Certainly, it is necessary to sensibly phase out the burning of fossil fuels for cheap energy generation, because they are not renewable ( a genuine consensus), but when the method becomes a tool for financial and political control, it is time to wake up to the reality of this purely politically motivated agenda.

Posted in AGENDA 21, AGW, climate change, Conspiracies, ENVIRONMENT, New World Order, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Back to Basics Part 1 – What is Global Warming?

Posted on November 10, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Information needing to be understood by the public, although it is technical.

“Figure 1.2-1 shows the annual global land+ocean surface temperature anomalies, based on the UKMO HadCRUT4 reconstruction, from its start year in 1850 through to 2014. Based on the linear trend, global surfaces are warming at a not-very-alarming long-term rate of about 0.06 deg C/decade (about 0.10 deg F/ decade)…for a total warming of less than 0.8 deg C (about 1.4 deg F) since 1880.”

A part of a huge amount of data supporting, scientifically, genuine criticism of the falsely-based political and financial controls being currently imposed.

Posted in AGW, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Science, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Selection of Today’s Health-related Posts.

Posted on November 9, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

From FaceBook: A few examples of available information to show that the official medical dogma is not always accepted by other qualified experts, and that research and an open mind are useful attributes in making conclusions with confidence.

‘Million Cancer Deaths From Fukushima Expected in Japan,’ New Report Reveals. [GreenMedInfo, Sayer Ji, Founder ]

The content of the new report defies what are chronically underestimated radiation exposure levels and effects produced by the International Atomic Energy Agency, TEPCO, and the Japanese government. As we have reported previously, the present day radiation risk model is based on outdated science and a dataset extracted from Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors, and which was arrived at before the discovery of DNA, and knowledge of up to six orders of magnitude higher genotoxicity caused by what is known as photoelectron induction associated with low-dose radioisotope exposure, i.e. the incorporation into our tissue of extremely low doses of radionuclides such as plutonium-239, uranium-238, and over one hundred others produced as a byproduct of the nuclear reactions that produce nuclear power.

Gandhi’s Anti-Vaccine Views Ring True A Century Later – [GreenMedInfo, Sayer Ji Founder]

The truth is that this quote only scratches the surface of Gandhi’s biting critique of the dangers, inefficacy, and malfeasance associated with the vaccination campaigns of his time. Gandhi, of course, is history’s most celebrated anti-imperialist, having almost single-handedly set into motion India’s independence from British colonial rule. He was extremely sensitive to Western forms of control and oppression, and was able to apply his intellect to the manner in which the Western medical establishment was coercing millions of Indians to succumb to the unhealthy practice of smallpox and plague vaccination  – See more at: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/gandhis-anti-vaccine-views-ring-true-century-laterA#sthash.e5BiSjlv.dpuf

Back with a Vengeance: Berkeley’s Head Epidemiologist On the Return of Pertussis [Cal Alumni, Professor Arthur Reingold]

Why hasn’t vaccination wiped pertussis out?

You can be immunized and protected against getting the disease, pertussis, but still have the organism in your nose and throat and spread it to others. Or you can have a very mild illness that is caused by pertussis that causes you to cough, and thereby infect others. So the immunity is not 100 percent from the pertussis vaccine. And what it means is any kind of herd immunity—the way we see, for example, much more powerfully with measles—really can’t be relied upon.

Newborn deaths lead France to reconsider two vaccines  [The Edgy Truth]

L’Express, Agence France Presse and other media in France report that two oral vaccines now recommended for newborns — Rotarix and RotaTeq — may be pulled from the country’s list of recommended vaccines following two deaths and more than 500 adverse events, 200 of them termed “serious.” These vaccines are thought to be causing intussusception, a serious condition in which the bowel folds on itself, causing a blockage and sometimes death.

CDC Investigates Itself on #CDCwhistleblower Fraud Charges and Then Declines to Share Results with Congress [Age of Autism, Ginger Taylor]

After the blockbuster revelations that Dr. William Thompson had come forward and admitted that CDC was withholding information that they found linking vaccines to autism, Congressman Bill Posey took the lead in investigating the matter. After many months of sorting through documents given to him by Thompson, Posey took to the floor of the House of Representatives last summer to confirm that there was ample evidence that fraud was taking place and called for formal Congressional hearings.

Utah Representative Jason Chaffetz, the new head of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, had reportedly committed to Rep. Posey that he would hold hearings, however those reports were followed by others suggesting that key members of Congress were coming intense under pressure from vaccine interests not to hold hearings, and instead to allow CDC to investigate themselves.

Indiana changes HPV vaccine notice after criticism  [WishTV.com, Associated Press]

Now, the notice explicitly states the vaccine is not required. And it also prominently points out that the Indiana State Department of Health regularly reviews immunization records reported to the state’s Children and Hoosier Immunization Registry Program, or CHIRP, and includes a link to have a child’s information permanently removed from the registry.

 

Posted in Cancer, drugs & medication, HEALTH, medical, radiation, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Psychopath Vs. Empath: The War Between Truth And Deception

Posted on November 8, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Getting in deep here!  From ‘Collectively Conscious’, posted by .

““If you would be a real seeker after truth,” wrote Rene Descartes, “it is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things.” “

If you are up to some deeper philosophical thinking, there is a lot to learn from this. Or, at least, to make you wonder.

“The supreme mystery of despotism, its prop and stay, is to keep men in a state of deception, and cloak the fear by which they must be held in check, so that they will fight for their servitude as if for salvation.”– Baruch Spinoza

Are you fighting for your servitude as if for your salvation? Then you have been well-deceived. You have been sheeple-compromised. Your thoughts are not your own. Your actions are not your own. You are in all ways a conditioned puppet who is under the delusion that it is free, and the psychopaths of the world are your uncompromising puppet masters. The questions you need to be asking yourself are these: “Am I willing to do what it takes to become free? Am I ready for the uncomfortableness of undeceiving myself? Would I rather be slapped by the truth or kissed with a lie? Am I willing to sacrifice my comfortable lie for the uncomfortable truth? Am I strong enough to fall from the “grace” of my delusion onto the hard and unforgiving ground of truth? And most of all: do I have the courage to disobey?”

In order to answer these questions effectively, indeed in order to come up with better questions, we must be able to transform our would-be psychopathology into a courageous in-the-now empathology.

I would love to copy all this but for the moment, this is an introduction to the complete article linked here.  [ Addendum]. Just for the record, in case of the links not remaining forever, and because this article is so close to my ‘heart’, it is reproduced in the Page ‘Thoughts’, https://tgrule.com/thoughts-for-the-day/.

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', AGENDA 21, Conspiracies, Human Behaviour, Philosophy, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

AGW – Paris Climate Treaty – Dealing with Facts OR Fiction?

Posted on November 8, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Thoughts relating to the much promoted and strongly supported “Climate Change” ‘danger to civilization’ movement: Featured Image -- 17267

It is entirely logical to consider this global attack on our well-being as an aberration of scientific principles and political agenda.

A few of the vast number of relevant articles to give cause to think about what it all really means:

Threat of ANAO Audit means Australia’s BOM throws out temperature set,

Leading questions on the Paris climate treaty

“Right. A path toward less plant fertilizing carbon dioxide, to prevent “unprecedented disasters” that aren’t happening (except in SimPlanet computer models), by stabilizing a perpetually changing climate that is driven by powerful natural forces over which humans have no control – under a 2015 Paris treaty that will inflict global governance by unelected activists and bureaucrats, bring lower living standards to billions, and initiate wealth redistribution of at least $100 billion a year to ruling elites in poor countries.”

Global Warming Hoax Spiraling Into Radical Tyrannical Beast

“Unfortunately for the global warming alarmists who are completely immune to logic and reason or any natural laws of science, the atmosphere, sunlight or any other laws of nature that interferes with their personal tyrannical global government agenda, not everyone is indulging in this heavily funded blind climate change lunacy dogma that is seemingly sweeping the globe leading up the U.N. conference in Paris.”

  • Is the planet warming because of carbon dioxide influences?
  • Is it actually warming because of man’s influences, other than our physical presence, urban infrastructure development and deforestation?
  • Is it apparently warming because of temperature measurement siting, selection and creative computing?
  • Is it warming at all?
  • If it is warming, is it causing current climatic events, and will it do so into the future?
  • IF warming was causing potentially destructive issues, is there anything currently adopted or proposed by the UN authorities which will actually, significantly affect the warming?

All these questions remain without official, scientifically based answers. The integrity of the science currently supporting drastic carbon controls, and financial and political upheavals being forced onto our population, is justifiably being questioned and must be addressed if we are to have justice in this world.

Posted in AGW, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Globalism, United Nations, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

TPP – What it Means to You!

Posted on November 6, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

From the ‘GetUp’ organization:

There is much to be concerned about!

“Initial analysis from our allies at the Australian Fair Trade & Investment Network (AFTINET) has confirmed our worst fears about the impact the TPP will have on our democracy, our health and our environment.“

“TPP text favours corporate rights over citizens and communities,” [And Governments!]

The full text of the infamous and secret Trans-Pacific Partnership deal has finally been released.

Insanely, the public never had chance to review the text before Trade Minister Andrew Robb signed us on, but at least now we can see just what he’s been hiding.

Initial analysis from our allies at the Australian Fair Trade & Investment Network (AFTINET) has confirmed our worst fears about the impact the TPP will have on our democracy, our health and our environment.

And while the TPP has been hyped as the world’s largest trade deal in history – the greatest challenge facing our world today, climate change, fails to get a single mention.1

[Here we have what I call  a contradiction of sorts. Blog followers will be well aware of my  conclusions about “climate change dangers”. They are certainly not caused by carbon dioxide presence in the atmosphere, and do not warrant inclusion in any global restructuring scheme.

Yet it is paradoxical that the goals of the TPP proposals are coincidental with those of the UN/IPCC movement – basically to facilitate the aims of the New World Order].

Minister Robb’s plan was to keep the TPP shrouded in secrecy for as long a possible, which is why we need to the word out about the TPP to as many Australians before it goes to a vote in Parliament.

Can you share this image with your friends, family and coworkers to help get the word out on the TPP?
Click here to spread the word on Facebook.
Click here to spread the word on Twitter.
Or simply forward this email to friends and family, directing them to the petition at: https://www.getup.org.au/tpp
So, now that we have a preliminary analysis of the text, is the TPP as bad as we feared? Let’s break it down.
The TPP still includes ISDS provisions that will hand foreign companies the right to sue our governments over laws that affect their profits.2
The environmental chapter includes woefully inadequate safeguards. Worse still, climate change doesn’t rate a mention in any of the 6000 pages of the text.
While Minister Robb resisted pressure to extend pharmaceutical monopolies from five years to eight, an initial read of the text reveals that five years has been set as a “minimum” – which could pave the way for extensions.3
Thanks to pressure from GetUp members and our allies, Minister Robb pushed to carve out the tobacco industry from the ISDS provisions, which would’ve seen Australian governments sued over tobacco control measures. But there’s still room for other corporate interests to sue our governments over other laws that protect our public health and welfare.
The deal locks in the right for your internet service provider to spy on you and report possible copyright infringement to enforcement agencies.4

But remember, it’s far from a done deal. Now that the text is finally available for public consultation, the Labor Opposition will have their ears pricked to hear how Australians respond. So we need to show Labor they have overwhelming support to vote this dirty deal down. Starting now.
Click here to spread the word on Facebook.
Click here to spread the word on Twitter.
Or simply forward this email to friends and family, directing them to the petition at: https://www.getup.org.au/tpp
Down with the TPP!
Alycia, Mark, Daney and Nat for the GetUp team

PS. Since the story broke overnight, it’s been picked up by a few media outlets – but not nearly enough. If newspaper editors receive emails from people riled up about the TPP, it’ll show them there’s appetite to cover this important issue more. Will you take a minute to write a letter to the editor to ensure the TPP gets the coverage it deserves?

PPS. The final text still needs to be ratified by each of the 12 countries. This will prove difficult in all countries, but nowhere more so than in the US, where President Obama faces a steep uphill battle to get the deal through a hostile Congress. The US is the linchpin of the entire TPP agreement, which is why we’re currently talking to our allies in the US to work out the best way to undo it. Stay tuned for next steps.

References
[1] Climate change missing from full Trans-Pacific Partnership text, Sydney Morning Herald, 5 November 2015
[2] TPP trade deal: text published online, The Guardian, 6 November 2015
[3] TPP text favours corporate rights over citizens and communities, Australian Fair Trade and Investment Network media release, 5 November 2015
[4] TPP text favours corporate rights over citizens and communities, Australian Fair Trade and Investment Network media release, 5 November 2015

 

GetUp is an independent, not-for-profit community campaigning group. We use new technology to empower Australians to have their say on important national issues. We receive no political party or government funding, and every campaign we run is entirely supported by voluntary donations. If you’d like to contribute to help fund GetUp’s work, please donate now! To unsubscribe from GetUp, please click here.
Our team acknowledges that we meet and work on the land of the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. We wish to pay respect to their Elders – past, present and future – and acknowledge the important role all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people continue to play within Australia and the GetUp community.

 

Authorised by Paul Oosting, Level 14, 338 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000.

Posted in AGENDA 21, AUSTRALIA, Civil Liberties, New World Order | 5 Comments