Makes sense, as a denier would expect.
Global Warming Advocacy Science:
A Cross Examination
I enjoy reading what other’s have to say regarding so-called CAGW (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming) know to all and sundry as Man Made Global Warming!
Do you think all the pompous political postulations and papers would hold up in a court of law? Hummmm…. I wondered that too! So allow me to indulge you in an interesting paper found circulating today. By the way – the ‘bolding’ in the following is my own emphasis.
ABSTRACT:
Legal scholarship has come to accept as true the various pronouncements of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other scientists who have been active in the movement for greenhouse gas (ghg) emission reductions to combat global warming. The only criticism that legal scholars have had of the story told by this group of activist scientists – what may be called the climate establishment – is that it…
View original post 411 more words





Pingback: AGW – Carbon Tax – Disaster for Australia | The GOLDEN RULE