False Perceptions – Part 2 (The AGW scene)

Posted on September 22, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

Perception according to the naive realism

Image via Wikipedia

This topic was inspired by Manny Garza, ‘Nerd Trek’ I wish to acknowledge his article posted on ‘Sott.net’,   “False Perception- A Modern Philosophy“.

This inspiration continues here and follows on from Part 1 –

“False Perception- A Modern Philosophy (Comments On)”

Having covered definitions and thoughts on the subject of ‘perceptions‘, touched on how they might be not necessarily be reliable, and raised the area of problems arising there-from, I would like to apply some of this to one of my pet subjects – the AGW debate/discussion/discourse/diatribe/debacle, whatever name seems appropriate to you. If you follow my blog, this will come at no surprise!

This particular thread arises from having read, not only the subject article, but an article on a blog supporting AGW (or whatever they choose to call it, depending on what the climate happens to be doing at that moment). I don’t think it fair to name this author or the article. On the other hand, I’d like to quote from it and that may be unethical or even illegal. I’ll have to take my chances. (If the author happens to read this, I will respond with acknowledgement if so desired).

Some specific extracts:

  brought up a familiar argument used by many whom would like to reject the current standing conclusions derived by scientific investigation; he insisted that if the science was so strong, it is up to me to convince him of that.

If, to the best of our scientific knowledge, something seems to be true, testable and repeatable, is it the obligation of the scientific community to convince the lay audience as such before the weight of the evidence is acted upon?

Scientific methodology prospers when done in the open as this allows a global network of experts to cross-examine the procedure, the results and the conclusions. Different minds give different perceptions leading to alternate, and otherwise unthought of, modes of testing. What stands up and is repeatedly supported by independent findings becomes a building block for our model of the natural universe, as best understood at this point of time by our species. It’s a special thing. It’s not set in stone, however, it’s as credible as we’ve yet derived.

That should be sufficient to make my point. Ok, we are looking at perceptions rather than the science. It is well-known that the science debate is raging. There are two overall groups of scientists, each with opposing theories.

From a simplistic point of view, one claims adequate proofs of man-made pollution being the cause of global warming and detrimental environmental changes, and of the need for and appropriateness of a particular solution – carbon trading and financial controls. They claim opposition scientists are wrong, not qualified and/or don’t have peer backing.

The other, claims the ‘above proofs’ are not validated, as many other scientists are not in agreement. They offer what appear to be reasonable scientific evidence of alternative scenarios. They also claim media bias in favour of the AGW group and scientific organizations and publishing bias against their own group. In addition, there are strong claims against the pro-AGW group of ulterior motives.

Both are perceived by their own followers to be practicing good scientific principles.

Both perceive their opposition to be lacking in valid scientific procedures.

Either could be right, but not both, because they are opposing theories. Logically one or possibly both are wrong.

For my part, selecting which is likely to be wrong is not difficult. There is much, perceived by many who are qualified to understand the evidence, that is wrong, or inadequate, with the pro-AGW “science”.  That is the conclusion gained via my perceptions.

The above cited extracts are included as examples of  false perceptions and logic.

In the first instance, it is the science that should be convincing, not the conveyor. And the science is not being perceived as convincing.

In the second, there is a need for the scientist to convince other scientists, not the lay people, of the validity of his science. This has not been achieved. Further there is a statement that the science is true, testable and repeatable. This is, at very best only a perception and a false one at that. At worst, a deception.

In the third instance, the author has it exactly right. However none of his criteria apply to the scientists he is supporting. He falsely perceives a situation because of his bias.

A final example – the email stating ” a trick to hide the decline” is perceived by “them” as legitimate science, a clever way of using data when the evidence is not otherwise complete. To me and most, it is perceived as false science and proof of it.

Bottom line – the AGW debate is full of false perceptions. The scientists are working with perceptions, many of them false. The supporters, likewise. The governments and media are doing worse, I believe/perceive them to be downright dishonest.

Therefore, my perception of this issue is that there is absolutely no substantiation for the current actions by governments and other organizations to impose costs and controls on countries and the people.  How can earth-shattering decisions be justified if made on evidence that can best be described as ‘perceptions’, rather than science!

Related articles
Posted in carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Human Behaviour, Human Folly, Philosophy, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

False Perception- A Modern Philosophy (Comments On- )

Posted on September 22, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

Illustration depicting thought.

Image via Wikipedia

Just browsing blogs early in the morning, storing links for future reference, but have stopped to read 2 or 3. One was on pesticides in agriculture, the real health dangers and the claimed need to use them or else. The second was a blog supporting AGW and the science thereof.

Thirdly, this Sott.net article by Manny Garza, ‘Nerd Trek’.

So I got to thinking about perception, in particular how it might apply to me but, arising from the other two posts, how it applies to others. Even, perhaps to Manny himself.

Here is his article, titled as above, (except for the “comments on”):

© Nerd Trek (The post offers share options so here it is).

Consider the old saying that perception is 9/10th of reality. I was never a fan of this saying since it can be such an easy outlet to take everything at face value rather than to seek the truth. Instead, let us consider that reality is but 1/10th of reality.

It is important to note that early Greek philosophers made the common mistake of basing their reality on their often flawed sense perception since they lacked sophisticated scientific equipment capable of measuring and calculating the world around us. In fact, it was not until thousands of years later that humankind could more accurately calculate and determine atomic structure with microscopes while advanced telescopes were used to ascertain cosmic distance, to name a few examples.

Based on the leaps and bounds of modern science and the ability to closely examine the world around us, we now know that what we perceive, as humans, is only reliant on 5 human senses which remain greatly biased according to our own prejudices and beliefs (The 6th Sense is another topic for another time which still remains unknown)

Exploring the deeper realm of existence, as a whole, the sole reality in which we are aware is only a small granule in the grand scheme of existence. We are often guilty in assuming that humankind is the Alpha and Omega of this particular universe; mistakenly, we still believe that our acknowledgement of another realm of existence can only be validated by humans. However, many things exist independently from the human realm with no connection to the fate of humankind.

This goes back to the old argument which asks “If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?” Rather than define sound, it is much easier for us to think it does not make a sound because we, as humans, are not there to hear it. Pretty selfish, don you think? But the answer lies in the definition of sound which is a vibration of waves in a liquid or solid. Hearing is the ability to confirm the presence of sound. Therefore, it does still make a sound in the woods even if humans are not there to hear it.

I believe that in the grand scheme of what we don’t know and the little that we do know, perception is but a small grain of sand in the ocean of existence that is comprised of virtually endless realms of possibilities and realities, despite probability. Perception is but a small factor of thought in the grand scheme of the universe, a thought which is often based on one person’s view of one person’s reality. Unfortunately there lies the possibility that someone could be grossly wrong while managing to influence others that her or his view is correct.

It is true that perception by a human relies on our five senses, in particular vision and sound, to provide awareness that there is something to be perceived. But the thought process/brain, having received input from these senses then makes from it a result, a conclusion in the mind, which is completely an internal, personal, maybe unique outcome. Perhaps, the sixth sense mentioned does exist and does also play a part in this.

Manny says – “Perception is but a small factor of thought in the grand scheme of the universe, a thought which is often based on one person’s view of one person’s reality.”

So, using my own words,  ‘perception’ is simply a reaction in our brain resulting from its processing of the input(s). A unique result, probably ‘flavoured’ by one’s intelligence, maybe education, logic processes, feelings and prejudices. An awareness of something external becoming a creation of our own, in our own mind.

Leading to Manny’s conclusion – “Unfortunately there lies the possibility that someone could be grossly wrong while managing to influence others that her or his view is correct.”

Now you might see where this is leading. My first inclination is to follow-up the example above, of whether a falling tree makes a noise if no-one hears it? He defines noise as the actual vibrations in air pressure (in this case caused by the tree colliding withe ground) and says therefore the noise exists. True the vibrations exist. However, I define noise as the perception of our brain via the ear system, of the vibrations. Therefore the ‘noise’ does not exist. So as he says, somebody can be grossly wrong (I would say maybe just wrong, or maybe just different). The problem arises when the view is imposed on some-one else! Or maybe when the wrong perception/impression/conception affects their health/welfare or that of others.

So thanks Manny, for awakening this response and thought process. Now to my issues.

In the case of the pesticides, the human behaviour patterns of the different “sides”, if you like, are absolutely filled with bias due to vested interests. The actual perceptions of the health dangers are different for the farmer, the pharma company, the retailer, the FDA, the consumer advocate and the consumer him/her self.

Even if the degree of health risk could be scientifically quantified to an agreed level like, say 5% of users will suffer asthma attacks, the perceptions would vary from insignificant by the first four, to unacceptable by an asthmatic customer. I realize I am talking about perceptions of something more abstract than a noise or vision but I believe this is still valid. Perception in the context of – “in the eyes of the beholder” or “ears”, or “mind”.

When the input information is not straightforward, the opportunity for perceptions to be many and varied is magnified immensely.

Read Manny’s article here.

To be continued – refer Part 2.

Related articles
Posted in Human Behaviour, Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , | 12 Comments

US Expansion of WAR Capability into AUSTRALIA

Posted on September 21, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

TIP post of interest to Australians:

“US military to get ‘unfettered access’ to bases in Australia”

Quantcast

Australian Coat of Arms (adopted 1912)

Image via Wikipedia

14 Sep 2011 Military ties between the US and Australia are set to take the biggest leap forward in 30 years, with defence and security officials from the two countries meeting in San Francisco on Thursday to lay the groundwork for much closer co-operation. Washington and Canberra are set to finalise agreements that will give the US military unfettered access to bases in Australia, a big step forward that will provide the US with a foothold between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. The countries are also discussing greater US access to Australian training and test ranges and pre-positioning of US equipment on Australian soil.

LINK: US military to get ‘unfettered access’ to bases in Australia

The BIG ISSUES here for me are that agreements are apparently being made outside of our so-called “democratic” government system, are of a potentially extremely serious nature and look like being made independently of the Australian people.

If such arrangements are put into place, I can only envisage disaster of one sort or another.  Serious damage to our excellent relationships with the Chinese government and its people, or worse, actually being directly involved in the American War Machine in its mission to control the Middle-East.

This is not something we should be doing – FULL STOP!

This is FULL ON SCARY stuff.  Julia, if you do this, you risk going down in Australian history as the most disastrous Australian PM. This possibility is already on the cards, but American forces and equipment in Australia? A trip to Hell for all of us!

PLEASE, PLEASE DO NOT DO THIS!

REFERENDUM SHOULD BE MANDATORY!

TIP link here.

Related articles
Posted in australian, Civil Liberties, Human Folly, Military, Politics, united states | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

A One World Government and Global Depopulation

Posted on September 21, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

New presentation of data in figure 20 of http:...

Image via Wikipedia

The full title of Intel Hub’s post by , is :

Big Oil’s Long Term Energy Plan? A One World Government and Global Depopulation

For those looking for proof of the global elite pushing plans for global depopulation and a one world governments need to look no further than the massive amount of propaganda being spread by Big Oil under the label of “Peak Oil”.

On the surface the propagandists argue that demand for oil will soon surpass the world’s ability to produce oil.

Beneath the surface is a network of the super elite including Government spooks, lawyers, doctors and other wealthy and highly influential people whose publications openly call for martial law, a one world government and global depopulation to deal with the “inevitable collapse of the entire industrialized world.”

The elitists behind the peak oil movement have penetrated all levels of governments around the world, including the highest levels of policy making in military, intelligence, executive and legislative branches.

This is not conspiratorial, they openly lobby governments world wide, including here in the United States, “to do what it is not inclined to do” in the United States, including preparing martial law and massive global depopulation.

As Life After The Oil Crash puts it:

Civilization as we know it is coming to an end soon. This is not the wacky proclamation of a doomsday cult, apocalypse bible prophecy sect, or conspiracy theory society. Rather, it is the scientific conclusion of the best paid, most widely-respected geologists, physicists,bankers, and investors in the world. These are rational, professional, conservative individuals who are absolutely terrified by a phenomenon known as global “Peak Oil.”

…

These estimate comes from numerous sources, not the least of which is Vice President Dick Cheney himself. In a 1999 speech he gave while still CEO of Halliburton, Cheney stated:

By some estimates, there will be an average of two-percent annual growth in global oil demand over the years ahead, along with, conservatively, a three-percent natural decline in production from existing reserves. That means by 2010 we’ll need an additional 50 million barrels per day.Source

Cheney’s assesement is supported by the estimates of numerous non-political, retired, and now disinterested scientists, many of whom believe global oil production will peak and go into terminal decline within the next five years, if it hasn’t already. Source

…

Estimates coming out of the oil industry indicate that this drop in production has already begun. Source

The consequences of this are almost unimaginable. As we slide down the downslope slope of the global oil production curve, we may find ourselves slipping into something best described as a “post industrial stone age.” Source

…

“Was the Bush administration aware of this when planning the invasion and occupation of Iraq?”

Of course they were.

Significant elements of US national security apparatus have been aware of Peak Oil since at least 1977 when the CIA prepared a now-declassified report on it. Professor Richard Heinberg explains:

The 1977 CIA document shows clear and detailed awareness of oil issues, including depletion, extraction technologies, pipelines, areas of likely new discovery, the quality of existing reserves, and the dynamics of the global oil market. The CIA has obviously been studying oil very carefully for some time and must therefore understand the issue of global oil peak. Source

. . . energy consumption is indispensable to our standard of living and a necessity for the Army to carry out its mission. However, current trends are not sustainable. The impact of excessive, unsustainable energy consumption may undermine the very culture and activities it supports . . . Source

While all of that doom an gloom is quite scary if you read the propaganda for the solutions they are pushing you will be shocked that the policies don’t include a future for the average common folk like you and me.

There is much, much more to learn, the full post is linked here.

One interesting aspect of this is that ‘Big Oil’ are claimed to be  funding anti-AGW proponents. Here, it is ‘Big Oil’ who are part of the de-population scheme, in turn the thrust behind carbon trading, based on the fraud that is called “Climate Change”.

Not everybody wants to think past the pages and screens of the MSM. Many believe that this suggestion of ‘World Domination’ and de-population are truly conspiracy theories.

Believe what you will, but if you don’t take the opportunity to learn; are prepared to simply believe the authorities without question; don’t stop to ask yourself “what if ?”; you may come one day (soon) to say – “if only I”.

 Over to You!

Posted in Conspiracies, Human Behaviour, New World Order, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Vaccine Lobby Launches Gardasil Safety Hoax

Posted on September 21, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

Gardasil vaccine and box

Image via Wikipedia

Those readers still not sure about whether to trust ‘Big Pharma’ with their vaccines and their marketing, please read this. I will show only part of the ‘Intel Hub’ post but there is much to be learned from the article, by Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones, Infowars.com

In the aftermath of Rep. Michele Bachmann’s comments about the Gardasil shot causing mental retardation, vaccine lobbyists and the pharmaceutical-friendly establishment media have launched a new hoax claiming the vaccine is completely safe, despite the CDC’s own figures confirming over 18,000 cases of adverse reactions.

ToiletThe HPV vaccine has become a presidential campaign talking point, after Ron Paul slammed rival Rick Perry when he pointed out that the Texas Governor’s former chief of staff was a lobbyist for Merck at the same time Perry mandated all girls in Texas receive the shot with an executive order.

However, the controversy only intensified when Rep. Michele Bachmann told the Today Show that a mother had approached her after last week’s Republican debate and told her that her daughter became mentally retarded after receiving the HPV vaccine.

This prompted vaccine advocates, several of whom have direct ties to Merck Pharmaceuticals to circulate the hoax, with the enthusiastic support of the corporate press, that the HPV shot is completely safe and has no side-effects whatsoever.

 

Schaffner’s level of comfort in asserting the vaccine is safe may derive from the fact that his National Foundation for Infectious Diseases has given awards to the inoculation-pushing Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as Paul A. Offit MD, a vehement vaccine promoter who holds a $1.5 million dollar research position at a Merck funded children’s hospital and owns several patents on vaccines.

However, the Center for Disease Control’s own figures clearly illustrate how the HPV shot is not “wonderfully safe” at all, as its Merck-linked proponents claim.

The CDC’s own figures show that there have been “18,727 reports of adverse events following Gardasil® vaccination,” including 68 deaths. The report also details the link between the vaccine and blood clots, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, as well as fainting, nausea, and fever.

 

The complete article is linked here.

Related articles
Posted in HEALTH, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Carbon Tax – The Politics and some important Facts.

Posted on September 20, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

Rather than simply link to this original post by ‘JustMeinT, some details are justified.

Have the Tame Scientists told Bob and Julia?

Day in day out – or at least several times each week I come across, what some would term ‘dissenting views’ on the reason for worldwide climate change.

According to the Australian Government, ‘the science is in’…. there is no dissent and thousands of credible scientists have defined the reason for climate change to be Human Caused Carbon Dioxide Pollution – end of story – now pay up!

I think the word they use is consensus. The problem of non consensus is simply ignored, or brushed under the carpet.

How can there possibly be consensus in the scientific community when over one thousand – 1000 – credentialed scientists have come out publically against the (AGW) manmade global warming theory?

More than 1,000 dissenting scientists (updates previous 700 scientist report) from around the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore.

Read all the article here, where you will learn a lot more about the politics, the lack of justification, the lack of interest by other countries, the incorrect information being told to us and school-children, and the evidence that a scam is in progress.

Related articles
Posted in australian, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

9/11 – Continuing Propaganda by the media.

Posted on September 20, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

The Pentagon, after collapse of the damaged se...

Image via Wikipedia

There are many people, general public and others, including some of whom have vested interests and others whose job it is to counter any truth publicity, who would label the ‘truthers’ as ‘nutters’. That would make me one too.

I clearly disbelieve the official 9/11 story, also the official AGW science, am vocally critical of the US politics and warmongering, seriously distrust ‘Big Oil’, ‘Big Pharma’, ‘Big Agra’, the media and the Bankers. I find it difficult not to believe that there is a real ‘New World Order’ movement.  Having so many beliefs against the authorities makes me a ‘NUTTER’ in capitals. Maybe an ‘utter nutter ‘, :-).

Being wrong about any one of these areas in question would automatically bring discredit in general, but I am confident of my assessments, the credibility of the evidence and the sources. There are so many blogs like COTO and others referenced on their site and here, that I am convinced our conclusions are sound.

Hence, I lean on them, promote them and try to spread the word, the word(s) of truth!

The authorities and the MSM claim that all ‘truth’ claims have been ‘debunked’. Look very carefully at such debunking and ask yourself “is this convincing?’. Remember they are defending their stories desperately, we are just looking at evidence and facts! They, in our opinion, have lied once. They are capable of lying again.

Are we lying? Definitely not! MAYBE we are wrong about something, but not lying!

Back to this post, by Anthony Hall, Globalization Studies –

Public Broadcasters Disgraced as Agents of the 9/11 Cover-Up

Pacifica and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation join forces in featuring Jonathan Kay in 9/11/11 coverage aimed at renewing the psychological warfare essential to the invasions, torture, genocide, illegal occupations, and Islamophobia characterizing the 9/11 wars.

Jonathan Kay was a featured guest highlighted in the network coverage of the tenth anniversary of 9/11 as broadcast by both Pacifica Radio in the United States and the English-language radio division of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

Kay wrote for Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation a hate-inspired, tenth-anniversary text claiming that those engaged in seeking answers for the copious unanswered questions concerning 9/11 are engaged in “absolving” all Muslims collectively of a “terrible crime.” (p. 167)

Kay’s diatribe was funded by a prominent Israeli-based think tank whose leadership comes largely from the Project for the New American Century. PNAC is the think tank which observed in 2000 that its ambitious program of military expansion and invasions could not be met without a “catalyzing event” like a new Pearl Harbor.

Entitled Among the Truthers, Kay diverts attention away from the evidence of what did and did not happen on 9/11. Instead Kay appoints himself as a psycho-anthropologist in pursuit of what this war promoter and Isamophobe describes as “the growing conspiracist underground.”

In his 9/11/11 coverage, Michael Enright, host of CBC Radio’s flag ship show, Sunday Morning, demeaned on air his old colleague, Barrie Zwicker. Zwicker and Enright worked together for many years as reporters at The Globe and Mail, the main competitor in Canada of Kay’s National Post.

Zwicker is the author of Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-Up of 9/11. As his wonkey subtitle proclaims, Kay equates even the most accomplished of those engaged in the quest for 9/11 truth, investigators like Zwicker as well as Professor David Ray Griffin, with “Birthers, Armageddonites, Vaccine Hysterics, Hollywood Know-Nothings and Internet Addicts.”

The full article linked here.

Please tell me if you think this is anything but true, and that the links between the media, PNAC and Israel/Mossad/Zionist are not real and damning.

Related articles
Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', 9/11 tragedy, Conspiracies, Cover-ups, Inhumanity, New World Order, Politics, terrorism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

MUSIC – Can change your perceptions

Posted on September 19, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

This post is, hopefully, a pleasant change from the usual serious stuff. Well this is still serious but a much more uplifting topic.

I am an addict of music. It is a very important part of my life, practically essential, if I am to retain a reasonable mood balance. My taste ranges extensively, but not into heavy metal, punk or run of the mill popular music. Favourite styles range from classical, including a lot of opera, especially Puccini, to Traditional Jazz.

It has long been a theory of mine that music lovers, those of us who feel music, who become emotional from listening to a particular passage, who consider that music is very special, are different from other people. Of course we are all different, but I mean fundamentally.

I am a firm pacivist and just cannot understand how a true music-lover can sit comfortably with terrorism and war. Most, music lover or not, do not, but the person who actively incites war, participates willingly and supports killing, torturing and injuring, can they also be music lovers?  Just a thought.

Having this particular relationship with music, it is easy to understand my interest in publishing this particular ‘Sott.net’ article.

Music Changes Perception, Research Shows  (ScienceDaily)
 

Music is not only able to affect your mood — listening to particularly happy or sad music can even change the way we perceive the world, according to researchers from the University of Groningen.

Music and mood are closely interrelated — listening to a sad or happy song on the radio can make you feel more sad or happy. However, such mood changes not only affect how you feel, they also change your perception. For example, people will recognize happy faces if they are feeling happy themselves.

A new study by researcher Jacob Jolij and student Maaike Meurs of the Psychology Department of the University of Groningen shows that music has an even more dramatic effect on perception: even if there is nothing to see, people sometimes still see happy faces when they are listening to happy music and sad faces when they are listening to sad music.

Smileys

Jolij and Meurs had their test subjects perform a task in which they had to identify happy and sad smileys while listening to happy or sad music. Music turned out to have a great influence on what the subjects saw: smileys that matched the music were identified much more accurately. And even when no smiley at all was shown, the subjects often thought they recognized a happy smiley when listening to happy music and a sad one when listening to sad music.

Expectation

The latter finding is particularly interesting according to the researchers. Jolij: ‘Seeing things that are not there is the result of top-down processes in the brain. Conscious perception is largely based on these top-down processes: your brain continuously compares the information that comes in through your eyes with what it expects on the basis of what you know about the world. The final result of this comparison process is what we eventually experience as reality. Our research results suggest that the brain builds up expectations not just on the basis of experience but on your mood as well.’

The research was published in the open access journal PLoS ONE on 21 April.

Journal Reference:

Jacob Jolij, Maaike Meurs. “Music Alters Visual Perception.” PLoS ONE, 2011; 6 (4): e18861 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018861

Related articles
Posted in HEALTH, Human Behaviour, Music, natural | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gardasil HPV vaccines found contaminated with recombinant DNA….

Posted on September 17, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

Gardasil vaccine and box

Image via Wikipedia

Public Health issues are so common and so serious, there are enough topics to provide full-time exposure publishing on this blog alone. Time and the desire to cover other compelling topics prevent extensive coverage. Thankfully ‘Natural News‘, SOTT: Alternative news,  JustMe in T and other blogs provide, between them, extensive coverage. COTO has a specific page linking vaccine articles.

However, certain health issues stand out for me, in particular those affecting young people and compulsory vaccinations. So, here is yet another example of gross public injustice, if not criminal behaviour of ‘big pharma’. I think that what you read here and in the links is an indication of a very serious attack on our health and well-being, the exact opposite of the publicly-claimed intentions.

This is the full title of yet another Mike Adams post:

Gardasil HPV vaccines found contaminated with recombinant DNA that persists in human blood

(NaturalNews) In seeking answers to why adolescent girls are suffering devastating health damage after being injected with HPV vaccines, SANE Vax, Inc decided to have vials of Gardasil tested in a laboratory. There, they found over a dozen Gardasil vaccine vials to be contaminated with rDNA of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV). The vials were purchased in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Spain, Poland and France, indicating Gardasil contamination is a global phenomenon.This means that adolescents who are injected with these vials are being contaminated with a biohazard — the rDNA of HPV. In conducting the tests, Dr. Sin Hang Lee found rDNA from both HPV-11 and HPV-18, which were described as “firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant.”That aluminum is also found in vaccines should be frightening all by itself, given that aluminum should never be injected into the human body (it’s toxic when ingested, and it specifically damages the nervous system). With the added discovery that the aluminum adjuvant also carries rDNA fragments of two different strains of Human Papillomavirus, this now reaches the level of a dangerous biohazard — something more like a biological weaponrather than anything resembling medicine.As SANE Vax explains in its announcement, these tests were conducted after an adolescent girl experienced “acute onset Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis within 24 hours” of being injected with an HPV vaccine. (http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-dis…)
 
rDNA found in Gardasil is genetically engineered

The rDNA that was found to be contaminating Gardasil is not “natural” rDNA from the HPV virus itself. Rather, it is a genetically engineered form of HPV genetic code that is added to the vaccines during their manufacture.

As Dr. Lee, the pathologist who ran the laboratory tests identifying the biohazard contamination of Gardasil said:

“Natural HPV DNA does not remain in the bloodstream for very long. However, the HPV DNA in Gardasil is not ‘natural’ DNA. It is a recombinant HPV DNA (rDNA) — genetically engineered — to be inserted into yeast cells for VLP (virus-like-particle) protein production. rDNA is known to behave differently from natural DNA. It may enter a human cell, especially in an inflammatory lesion caused by the effects of the aluminum adjuvant, via poorly understood mechanisms. Once a segment of recombinant DNA is inserted into a human cell, the consequences are hard to predict. It may be in the cell temporarily or stay there forever, with or without causing a mutation. Now the host cell contains human DNA as well as genetically engineered viral DNA.”

Innocent girls being injected with genetically engineered HPV rDNA

What all this means is that through Gardasil vaccines, innocent young girls are being injected with the recombinant DNA of HPV, and that this biohazardous substance persists in their blood. The implications of this are rather scary, as Dr. Lee explains:

“Once a segment of recombinant DNA is inserted into a human cell, the consequences are hard to predict. It may be in the cell temporarily or stay there forever, with or without causing a mutation. Now the host cell contains human DNA as well as genetically engineered viral DNA.”

The vaccine industry, of course, has a long and dark history of its vaccines being contaminated with cancer-causing viruses and other frightening contaminants. Watch this astounding video of Merck scientist Dr. Hilleman openly admitting that polio vaccines were widely contaminated with SV40 viruses that cause cancer:

http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=13EAA…

It’s called “Merck vaccine scientist admits presence of SV40 and AIDS in vaccines – Dr. Maurice Hilleman” and was partially narrated by Dr. Len Horowitz. You can view the full transcript of this extraordinary interview at:
http://www.naturalnews.com/033584_D…

If you thought vaccines were safe, think again. Get informed. Learn the truth, and please share this story so that others may also be informed.

Listen up, folks: Why do you think the vaccine industry pushed so hard for total financial immunity under the government’s vaccine injury compensation plan? Because they knew that if the truth ever got out about how many cases of cancer, autism and even death were truly caused by vaccines, they would be financially wiped out!

This latter part duplicates a previous TGRule post “Vaccine – evidence of inadequate safety and care” but rather that than the point be missed”.

Please read Mike’s article on his site.

In addition, I would like  mention an extract from one of the ‘related articles’, (Teens, Sex and Vaccines), and just put the question “if this decrease in sexual activity is an actual fact, (the statistic has not been proven), why on earth would it be so?” Still ‘if’, would it be a coincidence? Or is there a cause and effect? Given my cynical viewpoint and the almost certain desire of the ungodly to reduce the world’s population, could it possibly be that this is related to Bill Gate’s infamous vaccination program intentions? Could we be witnessing a deliberate attack on sexual desire as part of the HPV program? Possibly even a reduction in fertility?

“Teenagers, by and large, have sex episodically,” said Bill Albert, a spokesman for The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. “It has much more to do with opportunity than it does with a vaccination, for heaven’s sake.”

In addition, Albert told LiveScience, teen sexual activity has been decreasing over the last four years. Gardasil, drugmaker Merck’s vaccine against HPV, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2006. (Since then, in 2009, the FDA approved another HPV vaccine called Cervarix, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline.) There have not been direct studies on the effect of HPV vaccination on teen sexual decisions, Albert said, but dropping rates of sexual activity since the vaccine’s introduction suggest that the injections aren’t causing teens to throw caution to the wind.

“It hasn’t had the undesired effect yet,” he said.

What exactly does he mean by this last statement??? (my bold emphasis).

Related articles

Posted in HEALTH, medical, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Vaccine – evidence of inadequate safety and care

Posted on September 17, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

1802 caricature of Jenner vaccinating patients...

Image via Wikipedia

Merck vaccine scientist Dr. Maurice Hilleman admitted presence of SV40, AIDS and cancer viruses in vaccines.

This is the title of a ‘Natural News‘ post by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, Editor of ‘NaturalNews.com ‘ Extracts as follows:

(NaturalNews) One of the most prominent vaccine scientists in the history of the vaccine industry — a Merck scientist — made a recording where he openly admits that vaccines given to Americans were contaminated with leukemia and cancer viruses. In response, his colleagues (who are also recorded here) break out into laughter and seem to think it’s hilarious. They then suggest that because these vaccines are first tested in Russia, they will help the U.S. win the Olympics because the Russian athletes will all be “loaded down with tumors.” (Thus, they knew these vaccines caused cancer in humans.)

This isn’t some conspiracy theory — these are the words of a top Merck scientist who probably had no idea that his recording would be widely reviewed across the internet (which didn’t even exist when he made this recording). He probably thought this would remain a secret forever. When asked why this didn’t get out to the press, he replied “Obviously you don’t go out, this is a scientific affair within the scientific community.”

In other words, vaccine scientists cover for vaccine scientists. They keep all their dirty secrets within their own circle of silence and don’t reveal the truth about the contamination of their vaccines.

It is not a definitive scientific revelation but provides a scene which reveals actual scientist attitudes and loose concern for the safety of the public. Fairly serious stuff which strongly supports the other published articles on ‘Natural News’, here, and other health concern blogs.
 
Readers can see the whole article here, and arrive at their own conclusions.

Related articles

Posted in HEALTH, medical, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments