Inconvenient paleoclimate data that hasn’t been published


One reader commenter calls this a smoking gun. I can see why. What makes it more interesting is that the information is known to the alarmist scientists and they choose to ignore it. Perhaps they have a scientific reason? If so, it would be nice to hear it from them.

A pity the graph stops at 2000. However, the contrast to the claimed “warming” global average temperature is clear. Sure, it’s only one part of the planet, therefore only one part of what makes up the “average” temperature computation. Or would be, if it was included.

Was it included? Apparently not!

One reader commenter calls this a smoking gun. I can see why. What makes it more interesting is that the information is known to the alarmist scientists and they choose to ignore it. Perhaps they have a scientific reason? If … Continue reading

View original post

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Inconvenient paleoclimate data that hasn’t been published

  1. Reblogged this on What The **** Were They Thinking? and commented:
    No matter how hard the alarmists try to hide it, that darned Medieval Warming Period just keeps rearing its head.. perhaps it is THIS that is the ‘inconvenient truth’?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s