Sunlight and Cardiovascular Relationships


Age-standardised disability-adjusted life year...

Age-standardised disability-adjusted life year (DALY) rates from Cardiovascular diseases by country (per 100,000 inhabitants). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Thanks to ‘Chiefio’,  A fascinating Ted Talk on UV and heart attacks, I find this video to be very relevant to me personally and I suggest also to the medical fraternity. Of course also to heart disease sufferers looking for best options to minimize their risks.

More work to be done, according to Dr.Richard Weller, but the relationship is clearly there and only has to be assessed against the skin cancer risks in order to be used to our advantage.

Posted in ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, natural, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Cheney Admits that He Lied about 9/11


This is very significant information. Talking about the article posted on ‘Washington’s Blog.

Dick Cheney

Dick Cheney (Photo credit: Talk Radio News Service)

The more one reads the details of this post, the harder it is to deny that ‘they’ knew about the attacks in advance, yet did nothing to prevent them except allegedly shoot down one passenger aircraft, perhaps the one going for the White House. That was after the major issues of the WTC buildings and the Pentagon, where it can be inferred that he allowed the attack on the Pentagon by applying orders NOT to shoot the “plane” down.

It doesn’t make sense for a person to repeatedly ask for confirmation of “do orders still stand?” if they were to shoot the plane, which in any case arrived at the Pentagon unchallenged. (If it was a plane, that is).

What Else Did He Lie About?

The New York Times’ Maureen Daud writes today:

In a documentary soon to appear on Showtime, “The World According to Dick Cheney,” [Cheney said]  “I got on the telephone with the president, who was in Florida, and told him not to be at one location where we could both be taken out.” Mr. Cheney kept W. flying aimlessly in the air on 9/11 while he and Lynn left on a helicopter for a secure undisclosed location, leaving Washington in a bleak, scared silence, with no one reassuring the nation in those first terrifying hours.

“I gave the instructions that we’d authorize our pilots to take it out,” he says, referring to the jet headed to Washington that crashed in a Pennsylvania field. He adds: “After I’d given the order, it was pretty quiet. Everybody had heard it, and it was obviously a significant moment.”

***

When they testified together before the 9/11 Commission, W. and Mr. Cheney kept up a pretense that in a previous call, the president had authorized the vice president to give a shoot-down order if needed. But the commission found “no documentary evidence for this call.”

In other words, Cheney pretended that Bush had authorized a shoot-down order, but Cheney now admits that he never did … and Cheney acted as if he was the president on 9/11.

Cheney lied about numerous other facts related to 9/11 as well.  For example, Cheney:

  • Falsely claimed that spying on Americans, torture, the Patriot Act, the Afghanistan war, the Iraq war and the “war on terror” were all necessitated by 9/11 … when none of it was true

 

Read the article here.

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', 9/11 tragedy, Human Behaviour, MIDDLE EAST, Military, War Crimes, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

AGW – A Tale of Two Records – Misadventure with temperature records


Australia 2009

Australia 2009 (Photo credit: stoofstraat)

From another Aussie, “Ken’s Kingdom”, some enlightenment on misleading information sadly created and published in order to keep the illusion of global warming/carbon control requiring political action, alive and kicking.

A fine bit of scientific analysis by Ken, detecting the manipulation of maximums, minimums and averages, and locations that have created a misleading conclusion.

The only reasonable conclusion we can come to is that there is a deliberate intention to publish misleading conclusions. It would seem to be equally obvious that the motivation, basically to tell lies, has to be to cover up the truth. Let the reader decide the truth of that statement.

Sad that the official jargon has gone viral in the press and on the net.  The related article below is typical of many, and its all based on a lie! What more can I say?

The Bureau of Meteorology, in its recent media release, accepted and repeated by the media, made an astonishing claim:

Bureau of Meteorology confirms it’s been the hottest summer on record

Where did they get the data to make this claim?  Well, in their media release they said:

“Of the 112 locations used in long-term climate monitoring, 14 had their hottest day on record during the summer of 2012/13..”

112.  Not the 700+ of the AWAP (Australian Water Availability Project) used to make the claim about January 7 being the hottest day on record.  112 is the number of sites in the ACORN dataset.

So I’m sure all journalists reporting this claim would have referred to the BOM’s Time Series Graphs on their website, which use the ACORN data, to confirm just where this summer was the hottest on record.  Forgive the sarcasm- they plainly didn’t.  Let’s take a look.

First, here is the plot for the summer mean temperatures for all of Australia 1910-2012 (which includes January and February 2013):

summer1213aust

Yep, the 2012-13 summer mean was definitely the highest on (this) record.  There are 6 regions and 7 states/territories in Australia:

http://kenskingdom.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/summer1213-regions.jpg

Let’s see how each of these performed.

Northern Australia:summer1213  N austNope!

Southern Australia:summer1213  S austNope!

Eastern Australia:   Nosummer1213  E aust

summer1213  SE aust

South Eastern :  No

summer1213  MDB

Murray-Darling Basin  No

What’s going on?  [My emphasis].

Read the complete article ” A Tale of Two Records”,  here, to find out how the public are being hoodwinked.

Posted in AGW, AUSTRALIA, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Politics, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The ScAm Gets Worse—An Open Letter To Bora Zivkovic


No comment required. Just suggest you read the article.

Ok, I relent. This expose of Scientific America, whose scientific base has been clearly shown to be subject to influence from the authorities who support AGW, without proper scientific processes, justifies the nickname “ScAm”. Many of their readers agree with this conclusion.

Posted in AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Thrive Solutions Hub: An Evolutionary Tool for Resolving Critical World Issues By Enabling Activists to Pool Their Resources and Talents


By Ross Pittman and Jonathan Willbanks
ConsciousLifeNews.comThrive Solutions Hub - 150

“Every great and deep difficulty bears in itself its own solution. It forces us to change our thinking in order to find it.” — Neils Bohr, Nobel Prize winner in Physics in 1922

The Global Domination Agenda

The global domination agenda (GDA) is a plan by a small group of financial elite (henceforth referred to as The Powers That Be or TPTB) to gain total control of the world’s primary resources (money, energy, food, media, etc.) and to establish a sole global authority – with them in charge. Their agenda has been well documented in the film Thrive (2011) ­— which is currently being viewed by more than one million people each month (watch it here) — as well as in dozens of books and on thousands of websites — including here on ThriveMovement.com.

Regarding the advancement of the global domination agenda in the United States, at least six former American presidents and many other high profile politicians have repeatedly warned that there is a shadow government running the U.S. with “no allegiance to the people” (see here).

Of particular note is the following excerpt from a speech delivered to the American Newspaper Publishers Association on April 27, 1961 in which then President John F. Kennedy conveyed a sense of urgency in dealing with an “enemy” that is operating in secrecy to attack our way of life (emphasis added):

“The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings… Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe… no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of ‘clear and present danger,’ then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent… It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.”John F. Kennedy (click here for full transcript and audio)

There’s No Shortage of People Working to Address GDA Problems

There is no shortage of smart and dedicated activists around the globe who have been working, in their own way, to expose and stop the GDA in the numerous areas in which we are under attack: everything from banking corruption (e.g., the Federal Reserve, Wall Street) to our food (e.g. Monsanto, GMOs,), our water (fluoride), big pharma (vaccines, suppression of alternative treatments, FDA), civil liberties (NDAA, wireless wiretapping, drones), false flag attacks (9/11, War on Terror), neocolonial “nation building” (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria), the corporate media, energy, and much more.

As an example, here are just a few from among the multitude of “9/11 truth” groups: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Scientists for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, and Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth.

Despite the rapidly growing number of awake and aware individuals and activist groups, the GDA continues to march forward with seemingly no end in sight.

Notably however, the agenda is being slowed down by the efforts of an increasingly informed and active population. For example, massive public outcry stopped Internet power grabs like SOPA and PIPA in Congress. The Occupy Wall Street movement mobilized millions worldwide, bringing financial corruption, income inequality, and wealth consolidation into the global spotlight. Unprecedented grassroots campaigns like California’s Proposition 37 “Right to Know” GMO labeling ballot measure have brought once marginalized topics like genetically modified foods and the humanitarian and environmental offenses of the biotech industry into the national conversation. Even so-called “liberal media” is now openly expressing outrage over the previously off-limits subjects of the US drone program and the Obama Administration’s unprecedented lack of transparency.

But despite this considerable progress of generally isolated activist groups, the wrenches they have thrown into the machinery of the GDA have thus far done little more than slow down its gears while the agenda itself presses ruthlessly forward.

Even when we know in advance what TPTB are going to do, it at times appears there is little that can be done to stop them. Theirs is the ultimate long-term strategy, with plans laid years and even decades or more in advance. For example, plans to invade Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria were in place in 2001- just weeks after 9/11 (see here).

So, despite millions awakening to the reality of the GDA, it has progressed significantly in the years following JFK’s warning in 1961 of a “clear and present danger,”  especially since the false flag attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, and the subsequent “War on Terror.”

So, why have the efforts of so many intelligent and dedicated activists seemingly made little headway (other than producing information) in stopping the GDA over the last 50+ years?

Continue reading

Posted in Civil Liberties, Globalism, Human Behaviour, New World Order, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Israel celebrates successful 9/11 operation on Purim holiday


Didn’t expect to find such a revealing report about such a blatant admission of involvement, as this celebration of the 9/11 attacks. From Dr. Kevin Barrett,  an article posted at Press TV. Something for Americans to think about!

Israeli children dress up as the burning Twin Towers complete with impaled exploding airplanes to celebrate the Jewish holiday known as Purim.

Israeli children dress up as the burning Twin Towers complete with impaled exploding airplanes to celebrate the Jewish holiday known as Purim.

For more than eleven years, Israel has been wildly celebrating the success of its 9/11 operation against the United States of America. The latest example: Israeli children recently dressed up as the burning Twin Towers, complete with impaled exploding airplanes, to celebrate the bizarre Jewish holiday known as Purim.

Purim exalts and commemorates an ancient operation very much like 9/11. It glorifies the deceptions of Esther, who concealed her Jewish identity to seduce the King of Persia, then slyly tricked him into slaughtering 75,000 people deemed “enemies of the Jews.”

In other words, Purim celebrates Jews lying, secretly penetrating the highest levels of government, and manipulating the leaders of an empire into mass-murdering perceived “enemies of the Jewish people.” That is exactly what the neoconservative Likudnik extremists – Wolfowitz, Perle, Libby, and the rest – did on September 11th, 2001. The only difference is that these modern, neocon Esthers would eventually kill millions of innocent people, not just 75,000.

And if they succeed in tricking the US into attacking Iran on behalf of Israel, thereby launching World War III, today’s neocon Esthers could kill tens or even hundreds of millions.

The Israeli schoolchildren dressed up as the burning Twin Towers are not the first Zionists to wildly celebrate Israel’s biggest-ever attack on America. That honor belongs to the “dancing Israelis,” five Mossad spies who set up their cameras in Liberty State Park, across the harbor from the World Trade Center, early in the morning of September 11th, 2001, and pointed those cameras at the as-yet-undamaged Twin Towers. (Their video of the first plane hitting the North Tower has never been publicly released.)

When the planes hit the Towers, the “dancing Israelis” went wild. They began leaping, cavorting, and high-fiving each other. As the Towers burned, the “dancing Israelis” took pictures of each other holding up burning cigarette lighters in front of the burning Towers. And when the Towers were blasted to powder in explosive controlled demolitions, the “dancing Israelis” went crazy with joy. Their plan had succeeded.

Unfortunately for them – and for Israel – their wild celebrations did not go unnoticed. An American woman called the police, who arrested the four Mossad operatives, confiscated the thousands of dollars in cash stuffed in their socks, and held them for weeks. During their incarceration, the Israeli spies repeatedly failed lie detector tests. Nonetheless, they were secretly sent back to Israel, at the request of the Israeli government, by Israeli dual citizen and US Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff.

Later, back in Israel, the “dancing Israelis” went on television and admitted their complicity in 9/11, but denied having planted the explosives that destroyed the Twin Towers, saying: “We were only there to document the event.” (How did they know there would be an event to document?)

Another Israeli who visibly could not contain his joy at the success of 9/11’s “Operation Esther” was Benjamin Netanyahu. When the once and future Israeli Prime Minister was asked about his reaction to 9/11, he said: “It’s very good!” Then, catching himself, he added that while it wasn’t exactly good, it was certainly good for Israel.

Netanyahu would never stop bragging about how wonderful 9/11 was. Seven years after the attack, he was still saying: “We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.” (Ha’aretz, Apr 16, 2008 – “Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel”.)

Netanyahu wasn’t the only high-level Israeli caught celebrating 9/11. Another culprit was the legendary Mossad spy chief, Mike Harari.

On September 11th 2001, as the dancing Israelis danced and Netanyahu chortled, “retired” Israeli Mossad Chief Mike Harari was in Bangkok, Thailand organizing a huge party to celebrate the success of his 9/11 operation. During the merry-making, Harari bragged to one of his associates, Dmitri Khalezov, that he, Harari, had been responsible for 9/11. (You can listen to my radio interview with Khalezov at http://noliesradio.org/archives/29582 .) Khalezov’s testimony is supported by documents showing the fake IDs Harari was using in Thailand.

All of the Israeli celebrations of 9/11 – so far – have been unofficial. But the Israeli government is on the record officially applauding another of its many attacks on the US: The 1954 Lavon Affair, otherwise known as Operation Susannah. In that covert operation, Israeli Mossad operatives, disguised as Egyptians, bombed American targets in Egypt. When the Israeli terrorists were caught by the Egyptian authorities and prosecuted, Israel denied any involvement and complained that the whole thing was an anti-Semitic smear. But later, as the Zionist website Wikipedia admits: “In March 2005, Israel publicly honored the surviving operatives, and President Moshe Katsav presented each with a certificate of appreciation for their efforts on behalf of the (Israeli) state, ending decades of official denial by Israel.”

When will Israel officially award a Certificate of Appreciation to its Mossad operatives who blew up the Twin Towers and WTC-7 and killed almost 3,000 Americans in order to launch a series of US wars against Israel’s enemies?

Not for another few decades, we may safely surmise.

When Israel finally does admit its responsibility for 9/11, and lavish honors on the Mossad terrorists responsible, will it be during Purim – the holiday honoring Jews who seduce gentile rulers and manipulate them into mass-murdering their enemies?

See source article here.

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', 9/11 tragedy, Israel, MIDDLE EAST, Mossad, War Crimes, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Diet or Drugs to Prevent Heart Disease


A Brilliant Post, IMHO. Thank you Dr Axel F. Sigurdsson MD, PhD, FACC.

This ‘Doc’s Opinion’ article is linked here. Also read its connected comments for further insights.

Diet or Drugs to Prevent Heart Disease

The risk of heart disease has been associated with countless different things. Smoking, diabetes, high blood pressure, overweight, obesity, sitting and watching TV, eating too much fat, eating too much sugar, not eating certain fats, eating meat, not eating fish, eating too much animal fat, eating cholesterol, eating saturated fat, eating trans fats, high blood cholesterol, high LDL-cholesterol, inflammation, family history of heart disease…. The list is long. How on earth can we avoid being hit by this dreadful disease, the most common cause of death and disability worldwide?

The risk of heart disease increases with age. So, if we become old enough, we will probably have heart disease sooner or later, and most likely die from it. But that is not necessarily a bad thing. We all have to die from something. Dying from something else is not a goal by itself. So maybe we would be more accurate if, instead of aiming at preventing heart disease, our goal was to delay the onset of heart disease. However, defining our goal is probably less important than defining the methods to achieve it.

A huge number of healthy adults will have heart disease in the next ten years. Many will be treated with drugs, some will have angioplasty  and stents, and some will have open heart surgery. Many will die from the disease. A substantial number will be left with severe disability.  Many will not be able to work, and many will not enjoy the quality of life they had before the disease hit them.  So, I presume we all agree that delaying the onset of heart disease is a worthwhile target.

Who should worry about getting heart disease? Probably everybody. But, who should worry the most? Who is most likely to be struck by heart disease in the next few years? This is where it comes to the so-called risk factors. If yo have many risk factors, the risk of having a heart attack or stroke becomes higher. The strongest risk factors are smoking, diabetes, high blood pressure, high levels of LDL-cholesterol, low levels of HDL-cholesterol, overweight or obesity, and family history of premature coronary artery disease. If you don´t have any risk factors, your aim should be to avoid them at all costs. But, if you have some of these risk factors, what can you do?

Continue reading

Posted in drugs & medication, Excercise, FOODS, HEALTH, health, natural | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Why Are People So Inured to Reality?


I have just posted/reblogged the WUWT article on how, in the 1970’s, climate “experts” were espousing serious global cooling and maybe having to eliminate democracy in order to facilitate the control of “pollution”. Of course, they wanted to control the world, but the “pollution” was, as carbon controls now are, the scapegate to fool the people that the controls were necessary.

This has set me thinking about how people so readily operate in a polarised manner.

There are many factors but the fact remains that, in just about any area of human experience, polarization occurs. Opposite ‘sides’ readily form. Liberals and Democrats, Hawthorn supporters and Collingwood supporters, Republicans and Royalists etc.

Them and us, ‘warmists’ and CO2 villain ‘deniers’ (NOT global warming ‘deniers’), etc.

The same data is available to all, yet its interpretation or conception becomes radically different. Of course, some of the data is scientifically valid, yet still misinterpreted, there seems to be two ways of looking at it. Similarly some data is not valid, yet acceptable to some people, not to others.

Another example is the global financial CRISIS.  What is seen to be the madness of bailouts and austerity programs by some, are seen by others to be, not perhaps the best, but certainly worthwhile solutions.

In both of these cases, probably all cases of this polarized behaviour, there is much deliberate decision making based on a particular agenda. In other words, a decision is made not on the data/evidence itself, but on the required end result that is preferred.

This is not quite what I am discussing – more the human thought process that without agenda and maybe even without any bias, a person decides they know enough about an issue to reach a conclusion that happens to be opposite to that of another person. Same input material, two ways of looking at it.

One can be right, the other wrong. Both could be wrong. If opposed though, they cannot both be right. (In politics and football, the right and wrong are somewhat arbitrary, so I am thinking about more substantial subjects).

One factor that seems evident is that people are reluctant to change their mind admitting they were wrong. Again, this is different to having become polarized in the first place.

Another factor is that there seems sometimes to be a filtering of input information, a sort of permeable shield that deflects certain inputs but allows through others.

Just a meandering of thoughts for the fun of it.

So it becomes easy for a lot of people to conclude, or at least think and/or say, “you are stupid”, with the reasonable inference that they (think they) are not. This is not intelligent discourse because it is immediately emotive. Emotive thought processes are inevitably biassed and unthinking. Another area not really relevant to my theme.

Name calling is a result of irrational thinking and inability to make effective argument.

So, what has rationality and intelligence got to with polarized thinking?

Probably quite a lot but one needs to be careful to not hurt others feelings if introducing that question.

If half of the debaters have say IQ’s above 100, and another group are 100 and below, are they likely to be polarised in a discussion in step with their IQ?

Obviously, an above-average IQ person can still be affected by emotional baggage and have ingrained prejudices, things that interfere with rational thinking. But are we talking about baggage and prejudice?

A person of less measured IQ might be more rational and have more commonsense.

But with technical subjects like climate science, one would imagine that the higher scale persons would have an edge on the others in reaching rational conclusions. Not to say that  such a person would not be subject, if not more so, to vested interests and make decisions not based on science.

So, I named people who advocated catastrophic cooling problems in the 1970’s, AND those who now advocate catastrophic warming or some such inconsequential name, either ignorant, charlatans or both. So there, I did one of the things I suggested here is irrelevant and otherwise negative. Just to prove that I am human too.

Anyway, that’s what set me going on this polarization theme.

Posted in Human Behaviour, Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

The 1970′s Global Cooling Compilation – looks much like today (updated March 4th)


Cannot understand why this has not been highlighted before as it is a very important argument against the current CAGW activities. The then “CAGC” activists were also pretending that they understood climate science and even revealed the same agenda of world controls.
Same agenda now, same bad science and this overall picture shows them up for what they are – either ignorant or charlatans, or both.

Courtesy, one of the many readers of the WUWT article, another list:

“News media blowing hot and cold for 140 years

by Kirk Myers

Arctic Ocean warming, icebergs growing scarce, Washington Post reports

Seminole County Environmental News Examiner
Kirk Myers
March 2, 9:27 PM

“The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot,” according to a Commerce Department report published by the Washington Post.

Writes the Post: “Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers… all point to a radical change in climate conditions and… unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone… Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones… while at many points well-known glaciers have entirely disappeared.”

More evidence of human-caused global warming? Hardly.

The above report of runaway Arctic warming is from a Washington Post story published Nov. 2, 1922 and bears an uncanny resemblance to the tales of global warming splattered across the front pages of today’s newspapers. It is one of many historical accounts published during the past 140 years describing climate changes and often predicting catastrophic cooling or warming.

Here are excerpts from a few of those accounts, appearing as early as 1870:

“The climate of New-York and the contiguous Atlantic seaboard has long been a study of great interest. We have just experienced a remarkable instance of its peculiarity. The Hudson River, by a singular freak of temperature, has thrown off its icy mantle and opened its waters to navigation.” — New York Times, Jan. 2, 1870

“Is our climate changing? The succession of temperate summers and open winters through several years, culminating last winter in the almost total failure of the ice crop throughout the valley of the Hudson, makes the question pertinent. The older inhabitants tell us that the winters are not as cold now as when they were young, and we have all observed a marked diminution of the average cold even in this last decade.” New York Times, June 23, 1890

“The question is again being discussed whether recent and long-continued observations do not point to the advent of a second glacial period, when the countries now basking in the fostering warmth of a tropical sun will ultimately give way to the perennial frost and snow of the polar regions.” — New York Times, Feb. 24, 1895

Professor Gregory of Yale University stated that “another world ice-epoch is due.” He was the American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress and warned that North America would disappear as far south as the Great Lakes, and huge parts of Asia and Europe would be “wiped out.” — Chicago Tribune, Aug. 9, 1923

“The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to the conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” — Time Magazine, Sept. 10, 1923

Headline: “America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-year Rise” New York Times, March 27, 1933

“America is believed by Weather Bureau scientists to be on the verge of a change of climate, with a return to increasing rains and deeper snows and the colder winters of grandfather’s day.” — Associated Press, Dec. 15, 1934

Warming Arctic Climate Melting Glaciers Faster, Raising Ocean Level, Scientist Says — “ ‘A mysterious warming of the climate is slowly manifesting itself in the Arctic, engendering a ‘serious international problem,’ Dr. Hans Ahlmann, noted Swedish geophysicist, said today.” — New York Times, May 30, 1937

“Greenland’s polar climate has moderated so consistently that communities of hunters have evolved into fishing villages. Sea mammals, vanishing from the west coast, have been replaced by codfish and other fish species in the area’s southern waters.” — New York Times, Aug. 29, 1954

“An analysis of weather records from Little America shows a steady warming of climate over the last half century. The rise in average temperature at the Antarctic outpost has been about five degrees Fahrenheit.” — New York Times, May 31, 1958

“Several thousand scientists of many nations have recently been climbing mountains, digging tunnels in glaciers, journeying to the Antarctic, camping on floating Arctic ice. Their object has been to solve a fascinating riddle: what is happening to the world’s ice?” — New York Times, Dec. 7, 1958

“After a week of discussions on the causes of climate change, an assembly of specialists from several continents seems to have reached unanimous agreement on only one point: it is getting colder.” — New York Times, Jan. 30, 1961

“Like an outrigger canoe riding before a huge comber, the earth with its inhabitants is caught on the downslope of an immense climatic wave that is plunging us toward another Ice Age.” — Los Angeles Times, Dec. 23, 1962

“Col. Bernt Balchen, polar explorer and flier, is circulating a paper among polar specialists proposing that the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two.” — New York Times, Feb. 20, 1969

“By 1985, air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half… .” — Life magazine, January 1970

“In ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish.” — Paul Ehrlich, Earth Day, 1970

“Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind. We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation.” — Barry Commoner (Washington University), Earth Day, 1970

Because of increased dust, cloud cover and water vapor, “the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born.” — Newsweek magazine, Jan. 26, 1970

“The United States and the Soviet Union are mounting large-scale investigations to determine why the Arctic climate is becoming more frigid, why parts of the Arctic sea ice have recently become ominously thicker and whether the extent of that ice cover contributes to the onset of ice ages.” — New York Times, July 18, 1970

“In the next 50 years, fine dust that humans discharge into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel will screen out so much of the sun’s rays that the Earth’s average temperature could fall by six degrees. Sustained emissions over five to 10 years, could be sufficient to trigger an ice age.” — Washington Post, July 9, 1971

“It’s already getting colder. Some midsummer day, perhaps not too far in the future, a hard, killing frost will sweep down on the wheat fields of Saskatchewan, the Dakotas and the Russian steppes…” — Los Angles Times, Oct. 24, 1971

“An international team of specialists has concluded from eight indexes of climate that there is no end in sight to the cooling trend of the last 30 years, at least in the Northern Hemisphere.” — New York Times, Jan. 5, 1978

“A poll of climate specialists in seven countries has found a consensus that there will be no catastrophic changes in the climate by the end of the century. But the specialists were almost equally divided on whether there would be a warming, a cooling or no change at all.” — New York Times, Feb. 18, 1978

“A global warming trend could bring heat waves, dust-dry farmland and disease, the experts said… Under this scenario, the resort town of Ocean City, Md., will lose 39 feet of shoreline by 2000 and a total of 85 feet within the next 25 years.” — San Jose Mercury News, June 11, 1986

“Global warming could force Americans to build 86 more power plants — at a cost of $110 billion — to keep all their air conditioners running 20 years from now, a new study says…Using computer models, researchers concluded that global warming would raise average annual temperatures nationwide two degrees by 2010, and the drain on power would require the building of 86 new midsize power plants — Associated Press, May 15, 1989

“New York will probably be like Florida 15 years from now.” — St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Sept. 17, 1989

“[By] 1995, the greenhouse effect would be desolating the heartlands of North America and Eurasia with horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots… [By 1996] The Platte River of Nebraska would be dry, while a continent-wide black blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on interstates, strip paint from houses and shut down computers… The Mexican police will round up illegal American migrants surging into Mexico seeking work as field hands.” — “Dead Heat: The Race Against the Greenhouse Effect,” Michael Oppenheimer and Robert H. Boyle, 1990.”

“It appears that we have a very good case for suggesting that the El Ninos are going to become more frequent, and they’re going to become more intense and in a few years, or a decade or so, we’ll go into a permanent El Nino. So instead of having cool water periods for a year or two, we’ll have El Nino upon El Nino, and that will become the norm. And you’ll have an El Nino, that instead of lasting 18 months, lasts 18 years,” according to Dr. Russ Schnell, a scientist doing atmospheric research at Mauna Loa Observatory. — BBC, Nov. 7, 1997

“Scientists are warning that some of the Himalayan glaciers could vanish within ten years because of global warming. A build-up of greenhouse gases is blamed for the meltdown, which could lead to drought and flooding in the region affecting millions of people.” — The Birmingham Post in England, July 26, 1999

“This year (2007) is likely to be the warmest year on record globally, beating the current record set in 1998.” — ScienceDaily, Jan. 5, 2007

“Arctic warming has become so dramatic that the North Pole may melt this summer (2008), report scientists studying the effects of climate change in the field. ‘We’re actually projecting this year that the North Pole may be free of ice for the first time [in history],’ David Barber, of the University of Manitoba, told National Geographic News aboard the C.C.G.S. Amundsen, a Canadian research icebreaker.” — National Geographic News, June 20, 2008

“So the climate will continue to change, even if we make maximum effort to slow the growth of carbon dioxide. Arctic sea ice will melt away in the summer season within the next few decades. Mountain glaciers, providing fresh water for rivers that supply hundreds of millions of people, will disappear – practically all of the glaciers could be gone within 50 years… Clearly, if we burn all fossil fuels, we will destroy the planet we know… We would set the planet on a course to the ice-free state, with sea level 75 metres higher. Climatic disasters would occur continually.” Dr. James Hansen (NASA GISS), The Observer, Feb. 15, 2009.

* * *

Climate change? Yes, there has been plenty of that during the past 140 years. Despite warnings by “experts of the day” of approaching climate disasters, mankind somehow managed to survive. A decade or so from now, after earth’s climate changes once again, those who are old enough will recall with amusement the time, early in the 21st century, when the world went crazy over an imaginary threat called “global warming.”

Kirk Myers’ columns appear several times weekly. To receive e-mail alerts when new articles are published, click on the “subscribe” button. For a comprehensive look at global warming, please see the list of links to the right.

And to those warmists who are in denial of facts and evidence, and who say that these are just newspaper reports – “hello!” – they are quoting scientists. Just as the present day media is. The scientists clearly do not have enough knowledge and understanding about the climate to make the sort of political decisions they are.. Not then, not now!

To those who ask “where is the peer review?” – Peer review has been clearly shown to be a farce, just as the “97% scientists cannot be wrong” is a false claim and meaningless.

Sorry, but you are wrong about CO2 causing warming enough to be a problem and you have been taken for a ride. Easy to see how this has happened, but you should have been a bit less accepting of the propaganda and a bit more questioning of the evidence and claims.

Posted in AGENDA 21, AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, New World Order, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Austerity USA Begins March 1st; The Bipartisan Poverty Program


The start of the “endgame”.  Now will citizens wake up?  Will it be too late anyway?  How come there is money for warmongering?  You voted him in! How could you be so inept? Plenty of questions, few answers. At least it has been accomplished without blood in the streets, as happens overseas. Maybe that is still to come, which would be the reason for, (or  because of),  arming civil authorities, perhaps!

Cannot remember who said “the people get the government they deserve”, but it seems to be apt.  The most powerful nation in the modern world – reduced to a spent civilization. All because of greed  for money and power, and resources of course, but not for the people’s use.

The end of taxpayer funds. From now on just more printed paper or computer records, until the US dollar is hyper-inflated until worthless.  I sincerely hope I am wrong.

This post from from ‘nsnbc’, by Shamus Cooke:

Robert Taft Memorial. Photo, Cliff10666

Robert Taft Memorial. Photo, Cliff10666

Shamus Cooke – U.S. politicians have cried wolf over austerity long enough for the public to ignore them. A perfect time, then, for politicians to actually unleash the wolves. Barring an unlikely last minute deal, here’s a short list of some of the massive, national bi-partisan-created austerity cuts, according to the New York Times

  • 600,000 food stamp recipients will be cut from the program
  • Massive education cuts. According to President Obama: Once these cuts take effect thousands of teachers and educators will be laid off and tens of thousands of parents will have to scramble to find child care for their kids. “
  • $12 billion in Medicare cuts (more to come after 2013)
  • Federal funds to state governments will be cut, creating even more deficits for states and municipalities, and thus more localized cuts (the states have already made austerity cuts of $337 billion!)
  • Also, 700,000 jobs are expected to be loss, while 70,000 kids are also expected to be kicked off of Head Start.

And this is just for 2013. The current plan for the austerity “sequester” cuts is $100 billion of federal cuts every year for ten years, equaling massive cuts to jobs, Medicare, education, and completely destroying federally funded social programs.

Will it actually happen this time? The New York Times reports:

In private, Capitol Hill staff members and members of Congress have admitted that there are no viable plans on the horizon to delay or offset the cuts.

The finger pointing in Washington, D.C. has already reached a crescendo, with the perverted logic being that, if both parties are to blame, it’s really no one’s fault. In reality Democrats and Republicans created these “sequester” cuts, and they can just as easily undo them with a snap of the finger.

Both parties are choosing not to delete the cuts. They just don’t want political responsibility for the fallout, which many economists have predicted will push the U.S. economy over the edge into official recession.  

Obama has predictably blamed the Republicans for this mess, even though he personally began this process by creating the “deficit reduction commission” that helped shape the cuts (keep in mind there is zero debt crisis that calls for such drastic measures).

Obama could also just as easily appeal to the American public — over the heads of congressmen — to demand that the cuts be shelved forever. Instead, he’s proposing a “grand bargain” deal that he knows the Republicans won’t go for.

What’s in Obama’s grand bargain deal? According to the White House website:

  • $130 billion in “savings” [cuts] to Social Security, by implementing a “superlative CPI”
  • $35 billion in “savings” [cuts] to the retirement of federal employees
  • $400 billion in health care “savings” [cuts], much of it Medicare cuts.

Obama cynically fails to mention the words Social Security or Medicare in the above plan, choosing instead to write in code (“superlative Consumer Price Index”). Obama’s plan to avoid the March 1st cuts still assumes that $500 billion in cuts will be implemented over the next ten years, as opposed to $1trillion.

But his plan is just a distraction. Obama knows his plan has no chance of being passed by March 1st. He’s falsely portraying his plan as the only alternative to the March 1st cuts, even though a far better idea — the one preferred by a vast majority of Americans — is to simply to shelve the sequester cuts forever. To not put forth this option makes Obama complicit in the cuts.

Many pundits have speculated that Congress will allow the cuts to go into effect for three weeks, since March 27th marks a fiscal deadline that will pressure Congress to maneuver anew.  This might trigger a new round of haggling over a new “grand bargain” that again targets “entitlement programs” and re-packages the massive cuts into a prettier box. The party that does the most effective finger pointing after the March 1st cuts will be in the best position to dictate matters post-March 27th, so say the pundits.

Whatever the actual result, the Democrats and Republicans share similar enough visions that massive cuts to cherished social programs appear to be inevitable. Much of the made-for-TV bickering is pure political posturing, meant to fool the working people most affected by these cuts into believing it’s “the other party” that’s responsible.

Politicians have been able to get away with this disgusting behavior because there are very few independent voices telling the truth about what’s happening. Many labor and progressive groups are consciously lying about the dynamic, placing blame squarely on the Republicans, thus allowing the Democrats not to be held accountable for their pandering to the corporate elite’s demand to use austerity to attack the social safety net. In reality both parties are jointly attacking working and poor people via austerity, on a city, state, and national level.

If Labor and community groups united in a demand of ‘No Cuts, Tax the Rich’ and organized massive mobilizations, there would be a very different public debate happening right now. It’s not too late for these groups to tear themselves from the jaws of their attackers.

Read the source article here.

Shamus Cooke is a social worker and trade unionist and activist in the Occupy movement. He is a writer for Workers Action.

Posted in Civil Liberties, Family, Human Behaviour, Human Folly, Politics, united states | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments